Browse Tag

Silverpoint

My Thoughts Today: End of September

The end of another month is upon us, one story to hit the news this month once again involved the Anfi Group, it was announced the Lyng family had sold their 50% share of Anfi to the construction and hotel group Lopesan IFA. It was reported that Lopesan paid 41.3 million euros, which does seem to be a bit of a bargain. There again, with the woes that Anfi are going through, is it surprising? There is the investigation into irregularities in licences and permissions granted for the Tauro Beach project, which is being conducted by SEPRONA, a branch of the Guardia Civil. Then we have all the Supreme Court rulings which are costing Anfi a fortune in claims. These stories are not over yet and we wait for more to be revealed.

seprona

 

 

 

 

 

 

September has also been very much an American month, with articles by Irene Parker being published. These articles show what is happening across the great lake (or the pond as our American cousins call it), starting with the Letter from America: News From Across the Great Lake. In this article Irene sent an open letter to Stephen J Cloobeck of Diamond, it was her response to his letter to members on the Apollo acquisition.

 

This was then followed by the article on resale and transfer, it included an article from Tom Tubbs, who is on the advisory board of the National Timeshare Owners Association. It highlighted a subject which timeshare owners in Europe have also experienced, that of rogue resale and transfer companies. It also explained how this operates in the US, with a new company called Timeshare Transfer Registry, they keep a check on who and what companies the timeshares are being transferred to. But as he says the “scam” still goes on.

 

In More News From Across the Pond, we published a piece highlighting the Fox News programme The Property Man: Bob Massi. He is a Las Vegas attorney with a reputation as a determined advocate of consumer rights. This was followed by an article with an update to the real estate regulations in the US.

property-man

 

 

 

 

Then there was the visit of Irene Parker and her Husband, Inside Timeshare had the pleasure of playing host to their visit. For Irene it was her first time on the island and was very much a fact finding mission for her future articles. We spent much time comparing notes and learning from each other the problems that many owners have on both side of the Atlantic.

 

During her visit, Irene met the lawyers and staff of Canarian Legal Alliance, which she has followed from the US. While meeting with one of the lawyers Cristina Batista, she was able to get the history of the Supreme Court Rulings and how it is affecting timeshare in Spain. From there she then met with the staff at the admin office who look after the clients. As she said to Inside Timeshare it was an eye opener, stating that on her return she would share what she had learnt with other colleagues battling to help owners.

2016-09-23-15-57-03

It was was not all work, and we all enjoyed several evenings with good food and company. Her last day was a trip to El Faro de Maspalomas, for a little shopping and to see for herself the Lopesan hotels. This ended with a superb lunch at a beach side restaurant. We will be publishing her articles as they appear.

 

Other articles published this month included a warning of a text message to Diamond owners. This informed them of the Supreme Court rulings, but it is not clear where they originate from, the telephone number is an untraceable “burnt” phone, linked to a facebook page with no details.

 

There was also more news from the Supreme Court with an incredible sum being awarded to one UK client. In this judgement the court stated that fractional ownership did indeed come under the timeshare regulations, it awarded £235,542 against Puerto Calma Holiday Club Finland. More announcements followed with a ruling against Palm Oasis Tasolan SL and a ruling against Silverpoint in Tenerife.

 

After an enquiry about the RDO, we published the article The RDO: Does it Protect Consumers? This article laid out what the RDO is and who it actually serves, it is a subject that has been covered in previous articles. But it is always good to republish, especially in the light of recent events.

 

So that is September, we wait with baited breath for the events to unfold during October. With all that is going on it should be an interesting month.

 

If you require any information about any article published, contact Inside Timeshare and we will find you the answer. Have a good October.

The RDO: Does it Protect Consumers?

There are many trade associations which have been setup to represent the interests of their particular industry, but also to ensure that the public / consumer is also protected. So what about the timeshare / holiday ownership industry?

 

The trade body for this industry is the RDO, Resort Development Organisation, formerly the OTE, Organisation for Timeshare in Europe. It purports to represent the interests of resorts, developers, resale companies and consumers. But there seems to be a problem, it will not investigate any of it’s own members, even when there have been blatant breaches of regulations and their own codes of conduct. (see link: Tenerife Court Rules)

 

It is well known there are many cases going through the courts against RDO members, but nothing from this organisation acknowledging the fact. Look at the RDO website, the news section carries not one word about the 21 Supreme Court Rulings made against at least 3 of it’s members. The latest being another against Anfi, a long standing member of the RDO, yet again the RDO says nothing. (see CLA links)

 

At present one law firm has over 2000 cases at various stages of preparation going to court against RDO members, again nothing from the RDO apart from denials that any infringement of the laws have taken place. In other words don’t worry boys we will put a spin on this and protect you.

 

Only recently, Holiday Club Finland and Palm Oasis (Tasolan SL) have had rulings made against them, the RDO has said nothing. You the consumer are being kept in the dark, according to the RDO the judges have got it wrong, (even when they are unanimous decisions by a panel of 12 judges). They say these cases are not genuine, they are frivolous and even indicated that anyone winning a case will be liable to pay for all the holidays taken. Hang on, have you not already paid for them with maintenance fees? (see link: RDO Trying to Scare Anfi Owners)

albert

What is the mission of the RDO?

 

To put it simply, to ensure the interests of their members are served. They state they have a code of conduct and ethics, one of which is all members shall abide by any laws in the country in which they operate. This also includes the EU Directives on Timeshare. Yet for years they have ignored the fact their own members are operating outside of the law. According to their website they have a consumer policy which allows consumers to file complaints against its members. But in another paragraph they clearly state they will not mediate in any dispute and the consumer must first try to deal directly with the member concerned.

 

The RDO has even had the audacity to complain that newspaper articles about it´s members are poorly researched. A little snipe at Tony Hetherington who highlighted several cases of the bad practices of the industry and in particular another member of the RDO, MacDonald Hotels and Resorts. (see link: A new member)

 

In the past the RDO setup “The Enforcement Programme”, this was run by one Alberto Garcia and was called Mindtimeshare. It attacked any company that was not an RDO member, while protecting any company that was. This was highlighted several years ago by one Mrs Wilson, she approached Mindtimeshare for help with a dispute against Resort Properties / Silverpoint. Mindtimeshare failed miserably, she eventually took her case to court using the services of a Canarian law firm. She won her case for being sold several timeshare weeks as an investment which failed to materialise. Mindtimeshare has since been discredited and Alberto Garcia was forced out.

 

They have also set up another initiative called Timeshare Task Force, this is being overseen by Kwikchex, a company which also runs Timeshare Business Check. Again just like Mindtimeshare it targets any company that is not a member of the RDO. They have along with the RDO made out they have a legal authority to check on any business, then if that business fails to respond to their enquiries, (which it does not have to) negative comments are placed on the website. The overall picture is they are trying to look like a Pseudo Police Force without any official mandate. The company itself is run by a man who does not have a very good track record. (see link: Kwikchex)

 

Inside Timeshare has published many articles on the RDO, each time highlighting their failure to help the consumer. Each article even suggests that an independent body separate from the industry should be setup to ensure compliance and protection for the consumer.

 

Until the RDO recognises the fact they are protecting a discredited industry, failing to act against infringements by their own members, timeshare is going to remain a dirty word. The industry only has itself to blame and at the helm is the RDO.

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/tenerife-court-rules-silverpoint-responsible-resort-properties/

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/rdo-trying-scare-anfi-timeshare-owners/

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/kwikchex-chris-emmins/

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/new-member-egtbw/

 

http://www.canarianlegalalliance.com/visit-from-one-of-our-supreme-court-victors/

 

http://www.canarianlegalalliance.com/anfi-supreme-court-21/

 

http://www.canarianlegalalliance.com/cla-supreme-court-success-against-puerto-calma/

 

Latest News: Massive Victory for CLA Clients.

It has just been announced the Supreme Court has made a significant ruling against Puerto Calma, Holiday Club Finland.

 

Clients of the law firm Canarian Legal Alliance have been awarded a staggering £235,542 plus interest and legal fees. The contract was also declared null and void.

 

According to CLA, their clients knew they were purchasing a timeshare, but Puerto Calma tried to disguise this by stating they were buying a share of the property. This is commonly known as Fractional ownership, which apparently comes under timeshare law not real estate. The contract was signed before a notary in order to improve credibility, but the Supreme Court has stated that this is timeshare and therefore comes under the timeshare laws as laid out in Spain.

 

This will have a significant impact on other timeshare companies who sell Fractional ownership. In fact the First National Trust Company, who are the trustees for the Club la Costa Fractional Property Owners Club, did state in 2012 that Fractional should not be sold as an investment, which would suggest that even they believe it comes under timeshare laws. This ruling would seem to verify that position. (see following links)

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/fractional-what-is-it/

 

http://clcmembers.blogspot.com.es/

 

It was also announces on 19 September, that CLA had a victory at the High Court No3 in Tenerife against Silverpoint / Resort Properties. Their client this time was awarded £16,722 plus legal interest with the contract being declared null and void.

 

In this case the court followed the rulings of earlier Supreme Court decisions that contracts in perpetuity are illegal. Again this show the significance of the influence the Supreme Court is having on the lower courts.

 

So it would seem that Canarian Legal Alliance is going from strength to strength, achieving victories on an almost daily basis. The tenacity of the lawyers is certainly paying off, So congratulations the legal team and their respective clients.

champagne

If you require any information regarding this or any timeshare matter, please contact Inside Timeshare and we will point you in the right direction.

CLA Supreme court success against Puerto Calma ( Holiday Club )

 

Tenerife Court Rules Silverpoint Responsible for Resort Properties

On 1 August 2016, Canarian Legal Alliance announced a significant victory in Tenerife, this was against Silverpoint. The Court of First Instance in Arona ruled in favour of the CLA client, declaring their contract null & void, again the court used the recent Supreme Court rulings as precedent. (These now number 17)

contract

They upheld the fact that the contract was illegal as it was for more than 50 years, they also found other irregularities in the contract. Consequently the client was awarded over 25,000€ including maintenance fees and legal costs.

The court also ruled that Silverpoint was responsible for contracts issued by Resort Properties, this ruling puts into no doubt the courts see Silverpoint and Resort Properties as one and the same entity.

This has been a point of contention for some time, Silverpoint have always denied they are Resort Properties, that they had bought them out and were not responsible for what Resort Properties did.

The former sales manager David Taylor had consistently denied any link, even being caught on video, (see youtube link). In this video Mr Taylor states to a client that he can not do anything about the purchase made under Resort Properties. He blatantly uses the Data Protection Act as a cover, saying that under this act all records from Resort Properties are unavailable to Silverpoint.

silverpointlogo

The problem with this is the client already knows the people involved from Resort Properties, he had dealt with them before, including Mr Taylor

So how true is Mr Taylor’s claim under the data protection act? Not very.

When Diamond took over from Sunterra, all records of transactions and members became their property, how else could they run the club / resorts. Surely if Silverpoint was a completely new entity, not just a revamped Resort Properties, they would have had access to all members and purchases made under Resort Properties. Obviously they would need to know what has been sold and who the members are.

As the video shows, it was a ploy to make the client pay more money, the investment pitch! This company has been doing this for years, making investment promises and continually reneging on them. These investment packs have been peddled for many years and have been highlighted on many occasions, in total contravention of the rules regarding selling timeshare as an investment. Yet these companies blatantly made a fortune from this, despite being members of the RDO, yet failing to follow the codes of conduct and ethics.

What did the RDO do about this?

Nothing.

rdo-logo

Why did they not do anything as the body set up as a trade association to ensure compliance with regulations?

Simple, Resort Properties / Silverpoint are main contributors of the organisation, it is not there to protect the consumer, it is there to protect its own members. They even state on their website, they do not investigate any complaint about any member of the RDO, you must go directly to the member concerned. What type of trade body is this?

Inside Timeshare has also recently publish news that the said Mr Taylor is now working out of the York office for Monster Rewards, his new title is Senior Client Advisor, supposedly helping people to get out of their timeshare, yet ending up purchasing Monster Credits. After watching the video over and over, my feeling is how could I trust this man?

We have stated before, timeshare itself is a great concept, it is the people involved and how it is sold that is the problem. The RDO and TATOC need to be replaced, preferably by independent bodies, not beholden or financially dependent on the industry.

In the following links are the David Taylor video:

Silverpoints new website;

Summary of Monster companies;

Trade bodies and Associations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oNdi4NT4O8

http://insidetimeshare.com/look-now-giving-timeshare-advice/

http://insidetimeshare.com/monster-credits-associated-companies-summary/

http://insidetimeshare.com/new-member-egtbw/

If you have any information about any company you have dealt with and would like to share this with others, Inside Timeshare would like to hear from you. If you have any questions about this article or any timeshare matter Inside Timeshare will find the answers for you.

SILVERPOINT COURT VICTORY

Monster Credits Associated Companies Summary

Glenmore Consulting Ltd 08718409
5th Floor Waverley House, Holdenhurst Rd, Bournemouth. BH8 8DY
Offices also in York and Stratford. These are known as Advice Centers.

Directors
Mark Rowe
Nicola Rowe (Wife)

On 5 January 2016 the company name was changed to:
Monster Rewards Limited using the same company number and registered at the same address. There is also a Monster Rewards SL in Tenerife. the Ltd company is the UK arm.

Mark Rowe also owns:

Complete Internet Solutions Ltd which owns Monster Credits. This company sold the rights to sell Monster Credits to Hollywood Marketing SLU based in Tenerife, Mark Rowe is also director.
Hollywood Marketing licenced Glenmore Consultants Ltd now Monster Rewards Ltd to sell Monster Credits.
sellmytimeshare.tv is the trading arm of Hollywood Marketing and is also operated by Mark Rowe. (See advertising video) link.
Another arm is www.timeshare.lawyer according to the website on “who we are” they are a niche legal division of SellMyTimeshare.tv which is owned by Monster Rewards SL.

Hollywood Marketing SLU recently changed to Monster Group (Travel) SLU
Other names associated with these companies are:
Obviously Mark Rowe, previously sales manager Resort Properties/Silverpoint
Mrs Jodi Beard Marketing Director sellmytimeshare.tv

Cheap Holidays, Monster Rewards SL and Monster Travel
Niel Aylward telemarketing director. Previously Contract Sales Manager Resort Properties/ Silverpoint. before this employed by Club la Costa.

David Taylor and Joanne Taylor from Silverpoint. Now operates from the York office for sellmytimeshare/ Glenmore Consultants. Both are Senior Client Advisors.

The Timeshare Consumer Association (TCA)

This was originally set up by Sandy Grey, (1999), when he died it was taken over by a group of people wanting to continue his work. May 2014 Stephen Boyd (lawyer) instituted the new Company The Timeshare Consumer Association Ltd, he resigned in December 2014, Now a partner in Athena Law. The Website was taken over by Tolmex Ltd 08143115 and was directed by William Aspinall.

On 11 April 2016 the company changed name to Bridgewell Investments Ltd using the same company number and address:
Fernhills Business Center, Foerster Cham, Todd Street. Manchester BL9 5BJ

William Aspinal resigned as director on 8 July 2016

He was replaced on that date by Mark Rowe.

This now means that the TCA a previously independent information resource website is now under the effective control of Monster Group Travel and Mark Rowe.

According to some new information taken from Timeshare Business Check (an arm of Kwikchex RDO funded), When they published their findings on the TCA (23 June 2014), they listed as “Other associated businesses and trading names” the following:

Athena Law (again known to be associated with TCA)

Complete Internet Solutions Ltd

Hollywood Marketing SL

Monster Travel

Sell My Timeshare

With these links can the TCA still claim to be the independent voice for the timeshare owner?

Sandy Grey will be turning in his grave!

CLA Issue Update Video

Since we highlighted the latest Supreme Court victories achieved for clients of Canarian Legal Alliance, they have published on their website a video with one of the lawyers, Cristina Batista. In this video Cristina explains the significance of these victories and the history behind them.

One Foot In The Grave!

One of the cases highlighted in the video is of a family who had a very quick result. By the time they and the legal team returned to the office in the afternoon, news came through of the judgement being issued. The speed of this particular decision must have come as a shock, who has ever heard of a court acting with this speed? It only goes to show the effect these Supreme Court sentences are having on the lower courts.

 

Cristina also explains that they have around 830 live cases at the lower courts, with over 100 waiting to be heard at the Supreme Court. Spain is definitely leading the way in how the EU Directives on Timeshare are being implemented. The question now is how long will it be before other countries follow suit?

 

To see the full video click on the link below.

http://www.canarianlegalalliance.com/cla-latest-updates-video/

At present we are aware of only one other case being won by another company, this was against Silverpoint in Tenerife, we still do not know which company conducted the case. But it is only a matter of time before other cases come before the courts by other firms, using the precedents set by the Supreme Court in CLA cases.

If you have any questions about any timeshare matter, or about any company you are not sure about, contact Inside Timeshare. We will help to answer your questions and explain how to check them out. If we don´t know the answer we will find out for you.

Shawbrook Bank Announce Irregularities in Timeshare Loans, Similar Activities in the USA.

For many people their Timeshare or Holiday Ownership was paid for on Finance, these loans were usually arranged on the day of signing the contract by the sales staff. One of these lenders is a bank called Shawbrook Bank, with their head office located in Brentwood Essex. The bank was founded in 2011 and according to their web site works closely with the holiday ownership industry to provide finance for their customers.

 

Unfortunately it was announced recently that the bank had set aside around £9 million to cover any defaults in these loans. This has come about due to the discovery of irregularities in the issuing of these loans.

shawbrook

Shawbrook Bank has admitted that it did not do its due diligence when approving the finance for holiday ownership products. One of its biggest partners is Diamond Resorts, whose aggressive style of selling has resulted in many people being over stretched financially, then being lumbered with a product that they find is unworkable. They are also stuck with management fees that are continually rising, also being unable to get out of their contracts.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/28/shawbrook-banks-shares-plunge-on-9m-hit-from-dodgy-lending/

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-3663651/Shares-Shawbrook-drop-challenger-bank-reveals-loan-irregularities-cost-9m-finance-chief-quits.html

 

What did Shawbrook miss on its due diligence?

 

Quite simple, finance agreements made out by sales staff on the day of the sale have not had the usual credit checks made. Normally when a loan is applied for there are several checks that are made, we all know this as at some point we have had them. Firstly, does the applicant earn enough to qualify for the loan. Secondly, can the applicant actually afford the repayments, after other payments are taken into consideration, i.e. mortgage, living expenses etc. Lastly does the applicant have a good credit history, in other words have they defaulted on any other finance, be it loans or credit cards, or have they had county court judgements made against them

 

All these are the usual checks, being unable to fulfil any of these criteria would normally prevent the loan from going through.

 

Another aspect is how the applications are filled out, Many people spoken to over the years have said that the application had been filled out by the staff. It later transpired that the purpose of the loan had been made out as “home improvements” nothing to do with the purchase of holiday ownership. In some cases, even the income has been falsified. Unfortunately, for the applicant this could lead them to the possibility of criminal charges, after all they have signed the form.

edwincoe

This is not the first time a bank has hit the news in relation to holiday ownership, Barclays Partner Finance has been the subject to action in the High Court on this matter. Edwin Coe LLP, represented many clients of Resort Properties, who had been sold “investment packs” which were then financed by Barclays Partner Finance. On 16 August 2015, Edwin Coe LLP announced that the High Court had decided in favour of the consumer.

http://www.edwincoe.com/our-expertise/group-action-litigation/resort-properties-barclays-partner-finance/

http://www.edwincoe.com/high-court-decides-in-favour-of-the-consumer/

 

Many of these loans did not have the usual credit checks made, in fact Inside Timeshare is aware of an elderly couple who had been given one of these loans. They had been talked into one of the Resort Properties / Silverpointinvestment packs”, at the time he was 8o years old his wife 76, the loan was for £30,000, yet both are on pensions. When Inside Timeshare spoke with them, the question asked was, had you gone to your bank, do you think they would have provided the loan? Well we all know what the answer to that is. They are now taking legal action.

barclays

Unfortunately this is not just the case for Europe, in the United States the same controversy exists.

 

Roddy Boyd of the Southern Investigative Reporting Foundation has been highlighting this, on 27 April 2016, he published an article on a Credit Union which has been supplying loans for Diamond Resorts clients. Quorum Federal Credit Union has been in operation for 82 years, as with all credit unions they are member based.

quorum

http://sirf-online.org/2016/04/27/the-enabler-and-the-lifeline-diamond-resorts-and-quorum-fcu/

 

Quorum, has been supplying loans for the holiday ownership industry for years, Diamond Resorts are their largest portfolio. Diamond tend to send the riskier applicants to the credit union, these are those in the lower credit ratings, what the Americans call “subprime”. In other words the banks would not touch them with the proverbial barge pole.

 

According to Roddy Boyd the deal provided around $40 million in loans for Diamond and in return these borrowers became members of Quorum. Sounds like a win win for both, (not the consumer).

 

At least Shawbrook Bank have admitted that it has seen a problem in this area, setting aside a substantial amount to cover any future problems. In the end a loan for a holiday product which will on average be around £10,000 or more, is a huge commitment, not one that should be signed and approved on the day. Especially by the sales staff who have a vested interest in getting the “deal”.

 

Inside Timeshare would like to thank Irene Parker of the The Street for supplying the link to Roddy Boyd´s article. Do read it in full yourself as we have only just touched the surface, also read the following link, again it makes interesting reading.

 

http://sirf-online.org/2016/03/07/27464/

 

If you have any questions relating to this article or any others published contact Inside Timeshare and we will try to find the answer for you.

TCA Highlight Silverpoint Preying on the Vulnerable.

The TCA yesterday 8 June 2016, published an article regarding how Silverpoint (Resort Properties) may be taking advantage of existing members who they know are in a vulnerable position.

tca logo

The TCA have received a letter from a couple who outlined their dealings with Silverpoint. The couple are retired and care for a daughter who is severely disabled, what follows is in my mind just disgusting.

 

The sales rep on finding this out called in his manager, he offered them a “FAVOUR”. They were offered an Investment, which is illegal in the selling of timeshare. This favour was to spend another sum around £10,000 on a one week unit of timeshare, this unit would then be rented out in 2015 by Silverpoint on their behalf in 2015 for £800.

silverpointlogo

 

 

 

After this Silverpoint promised to refund the £10,000 as they would then sell it on. When they returned in 2014 they were told this was not then possible and were convinced to trade it in for another resort The Club Paradiso They have now “invested” around £30,000 for timeshare units they can not afford.

 

This particular practice has been going on for many years and there have been many cases upheld in the courts. This particular practice was highlighted in a blog called mindtimeshare the truth by a Mrs Wilson, who had also been taken in by the sales pitch.

 

Please be aware that timeshare does not increase in value and any promise that you will either get your “investment” back or even make a profit is false, it is also against the EU Timeshare Directives. The courts in Spain are very aware of this practice and are now ruling very much in the client’s favour.

 

It is also disappointing that as Silverpoint are also TATOC and RDO members that this has not been stopped. Is it because this company is one of the main contributors of funds to these organisations. After all TATOC should be looking after the interests of the owners and the RDO should be ensuring that its members play according to the rules and the law.

 

tatoc logordo-logo

For the full story follow the link to the TCA and also Mrs Wilson’s blog.

 

http://www.timeshareconsumerassociation.org.uk/2016/06/08/is-silverpoint-preying-on-the-vulnerable/

 

http://www.mindtimesharetruth.com/

 

If you have had any dealings such as this Inside Timeshare would like to hear from you, if you require any information as to how you stand legally we will point you in the right direction.

Here We Go Again! Another Supreme Court Ruling for CLA against Anfi.

Canarian Legal Alliance once again announces another Supreme Court victory against Anfi, this was published on their website on 31 May 2016.

 

The Supreme Court again has awarded one of their clients double the deposit back, due to the fact of taking payments within the 14 day cooling off period. The court has also reinforced the fact that floating weeks and contracts in perpetuity are illegal. This client will be receiving over 30,000€ and have their contract canceled.

 

This now brings the number of rulings by the Supreme Court on behalf of CLA clients to nine. This will obviously have a profound effect on all timeshares sold within Spanish jurisdiction, the floodgates have been opened and there is now no turning back.

 

Consumers now have the full protection of the law despite what the timeshare companies and the trade body the RDO may say. In the end it is only themselves to blame for their present predicament.

 

It has also come to the attention of Inside Timeshare that another case brought in Tenerife against Silverpoint has resulted in a victory. The only information so far is the case was conducted on behalf of a British Silverpoint client, the case was heard by Judge José Pablo Carrera Fernadez. At present we do not know which firm started these proceedings. It would seem that the court in Tenerife has also used the Supreme Court rulings in its judgement. More will be published on this when the information becomes available.

 

Once again congratulations to the respective clients and both the legal teams that fought your cases.

slicksaleman

THE SUPREME COURT STRIKES AGAIN

Inside Timeshare is here to bring you the latest news and information about the world of timeshare. If you need any advise or information about your own timeshare or any company that you may be thinking of dealing with, contact Inside Timeshare for free and impartial advice.

Look Who Is Now Giving Timeshare Advice!!!!

Firstly thank you to the TCA for giving me a good laugh over the past couple of days, with their articles on Silverpoint. Well well well, things never cease to amaze me in the industry of timeshare. The company with the biggest track record of destroying an otherwise good product is now in the business of giving “ADVICE”.

http://www.timeshareconsumerassociation.org.uk/2016/04/19/silverpoint-bait-and-switch/

http://www.timeshareconsumerassociation.org.uk/2016/04/20/silverpoint-consumer-advice/

Silverpoint_Consumer_advice_Logo_308U

Siverpoint Consumer Advice website, the latest tool in their attempt to deceive the poor old public. The track record of this company is a long and painful one. As many people have found out to their financial cost.

Let’s start with their wonderful “Investment Scheme”, selling blocks of weeks with the promise of a return within 2 years of around 15%, with the sale of these weeks. This has cost you around £20,000 to £30,000. Then comes the top up, sorry these weeks that you have are not selling well, because people want something better. Tell you what, why don’t you buy 6 weeks in this resort which is much better, it has a higher sale value and is sought after. What we can do is take the 6 weeks you own already and trade them in for the new one.

So they give you a price of say £50,000 with a trade in of £15,000, but you can’t afford this. You also do not want to lose your “investment”, so what do they do? Arrange a finance agreement for you on the day. Barclays Partner Finance is well known for working with Silverpoint and has been the subject of several court cases.

Now you have a new “investment deal”. Again the promise is they will sell them for you in 2 years, in the meantime they will rent them for you to help pay the maintenance. Guess what happens next? They can’t sell and want you to trade in for another better resort or even the Sunseeker yachts they used to peddle.

buyerbeware

All this is in the public domain, this company has been and still is the subject of legal action. Below are three videos taken from youtube. The first two show a sales rep called Leanne and then the Sales Director Dave Taylor, basically fobbing off a client who has been duped of around £90,000. The third video shows a courtroom where Dave Taylor, who looks remarkably nervous, trying to say that Silverpoint are not Resort Properties , well this didn’t go down well with the judge. The owner of both companies is Bob Trotta. Del Boy would not be proud of the scams that this lot have pulled, at least he had some scruples.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkrdK0shvn4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oNdi4NT4O8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ksff6yofqJs

As you can see from these videos, this company cannot be trusted, so how can they give any advice?

They also say on their website only trust RDO and TATOC members, these organisations as Inside Timeshare has previously shown are there only for the benefit of the industry. Not to forget that Silverpoint being a major contributor to these organisations funding.

rdo-logotatoc logo

I have also looked at the website for Canarian Legal Alliance as they have had great success in court against this company, In the news section under the tag of Silverpoint are the archives of cases won. They show cases going back to 2013, so everything is in the public domain and this company along with the RDO and TATOC are trying to make out that none of this is true. Only their advice is worth anything, well I for one do not believe a word of it, the truth is out there, it is up to you to find it and your choice on who to believe.

Inside Timeshare is not affiliated to any timeshare company, the information provided is taken from research and written to provide you with independent views on what should be a great product.