Browse Tag

ANFI Group

Truth, What is Truth?

Over the past few weeks, Inside Timeshare has received many enquiries regarding Anfi and who is telling the truth regarding the court cases and Supreme Court rulings. Many of these questions have been coming from Anfi members themselves, having received emails and letters from Anfi who deny anything is going on. So the question is what is the truth?

According to a letter sent by the CEO of Anfi Group in June, which we published in the following article:

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-ceos-letter-members-desperation/

mahatma-gandhi-quote-an-error-does-not-become-truth-by-reason-of

Anfi deny any wrongdoing, they continue to state they are not losing court cases, that the Supreme Court stated that Anfi were acting in good faith when selling perpetuity contracts. This in itself is a little strange as the Supreme Court has verified that the law 42/98 which states that contracts must be of a maximum 50 years, is correct. In other words why would this court say that perpetuity contracts are illegal, then on the other hand that Anfi acted in good faith?

According to the CEO, Anfi members are asking for their help in getting out of court cases instigated by various law firms, again this does not ring true, after all having used legal services in the past, you employ the law firm, if you wish to withdraw that is your right. You don’t need any help, especially from Anfi. Is this yet another deception?

In another section of his letter he goes on to say the Supreme Court agrees that any member who has had their contract declared null & void should in principle pay for past holidays taken. Inside Timeshare has not seen any evidence of this, in fact this point has been going on for some time, with even the RDO publishing their support for this. Again it is another ploy by the timeshare industry to save itself!

We won’t dwell on the CEO’s letter as you can read the previous article.

Another couple contacted Inside Timeshare after receiving an email about their own membership. It would seem this particular couple are not happy with their purchase, and wish to terminate the agreement. It starts by stating that Anfi does not consider their contract to be illegal until a court deems it so.

Again this flies in the face of previous statements, that their contracts are legal and it is the courts that have got it wrong, the truth is, the courts have found the contracts have infringed the timeshare law, is this another untruth?

In this email Anfi state once again that they are not losing, that cases which have been lost at the Court of First Instance are going to appeal. Yes they may be going to appeal, but only to prolong the process. After all, now that the Supreme Court has made 57 rulings against various timeshare companies, of which around 32 have been made against Anfi, all the courts must abide by them regardless. If the law has been broken then that is that!

On the point of one part of the law, the taking of deposits within the 14 day cooling off period, in this particular email, Anfi deny taking any deposit for the sale of the timeshare. They say they have a signed reservation form for so many nights accommodation at their Hotel Gran Anfi. Hang on a minute, is it not a timeshare resort?

Regardless of that point, according to them there is no mention on the documentation that it forms part of the payment for membership. Bit of a moot point there, after all the timeshare law states that no payment shall be taken on the day the contract is signed, even by a third party. So one could interpret that as the payment taken at the time of signing, even for accommodation, is payment to a third party! We’ll leave that one for the judges to decide.

legal clipart

The tone of the email is not very pleasant, the writer states “Our company is strongly focused on the future, and the goal is to have only loyal members”, well not very conducive to customer relations, would you not agree?

Well, let’s get down to some facts, Inside Timeshare during its investigations over the months has come up with the following figures. These may just be a little out of date as they were compiled some months ago and many more court cases have taken place since.

Cases lost by Anfi upto June 2017

Court                                              1st Instance                2nd Instance           High               Court Supreme
2015                                                      11                                      2                         18                               3

2016                                                       8                                      0                         17                              27

2017                                                       9                                       1                           4                               2
______________________________________________________________________
Total                                                     28                                     3                         39                              32

Remember, it was in March 2015, that the first Supreme Court ruling was made against Anfi, this was the case of the Norwegian lady Mrs Tove Grimsbo. Or is this another fact that Anfi are not acknowledging?

It is estimated that since January 2015 the courts have awarded over 3,435,974.56€ to former Anfi clients.

Only last week one client was awarded their purchase price back, 27,895€ by the Court of First Instance Number 2, in Maspalomas. That same court also ordered that double the deposit was to be paid back which amounted to 28,611€. Plus the legal fees, so this client receives back more than they originally paid. The infringement was again for a contract in perpetuity, longer than 50 years, so again another untruth told by Anfi that their contracts are legal!

Also we must ask about the recent Anfi vote, which asked members to vote for new contracts which comply with the law, it goes against what the CEO and the writer of the email state, that their contracts are not illegal.

Follow the links below for previous articles on this vote.

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-sgm-what-are-they-up-to/

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-special-general-meeting-vote/

In the article on the last link there are figures that were supplied to Inside Timeshare that show payouts, cases won, closed and ready for execution. We leave it to you the reader to decide what the truth is, we already know.

truth

My Thoughts Today: End of November

Yes, it is that time again, the end of another month and what a month it has been. Canarian Legal Alliance has now had 36 Supreme Court rulings in favour of their clients, the latest was on 28 November.

In the latest ruling, again against Anfi, the British clients will receive £22,940 plus legal interest and legal fees, with their contract being declared null and void. Once again the Supreme Court reiterated their previous judgements that floating weeks are illegal.

This latest ruling comes just 4 days after the Supreme Court ruled against Palm Oasis /Tasolan, again the ruling was about floating weeks. In this case the Norwegian clients have been awarded 8,810€ plus legal interest and legal fees. Their contract was also declared null and void.

It does make you wonder why these companies are taking these cases, which have already been ruled over at the lower courts, all the way to the Supreme Court?

We know that Anfi, the RDO and others, still believe that the courts have got it wrong, but after 36 rulings in favour of clients, one has think are they just trying to delay?

It has to be pointed out that these rulings cannot be changed, the Supreme Court has unanimously found in favour of the consumer on each case, with lower courts now using them in their deliberations.

Tribunal-Supremo

We have even seen this month the High Court Number 4 in Malaga using these judgements in the case against Leisure Group Ltd. In this case the CLA client has been awarded 12,390€ plus legal interest and legal fees. Their contract has also been declared null and void.

Canarian Legal Alliance has now spread its wings from the Canary Islands and over to the mainland. They have had success in the past at the courts in Fuengirola and also in Barcelona, this latest case in Malaga just goes to prove that any contract sold that is illegal will be ruled against no matter where. CLA are certainly becoming a force to be reckoned with.

We have again this month published articles on the changing face of the TCA, it must also be pointed out that several readers have also noticed that articles published here, are several days later appearing on the TCA website. The content has been juggled around a little, but it can be clearly seen from the style of writing where they did originate.

Inside Timeshare is to be honest, quite flattered that they are using our articles, the only problem is one of acknowledgement. When using articles written or published by someone else, it is normal practise to state where this came from citing the source and usually providing a link.

In another piece regarding the TCA, we published the article on incorrect information, this concerned their post on cold calling. In this they stated that “Cold calling in the UK is illegal as it is considered a breach of privacy”. As we showed in the article, cold calling is not illegal, but there are some very important a rules regarding how it is done. These were published along with a link to the Information Commissioner’s website for the full regulations. (see link below)

https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-pecr/electronic-and-telephone-marketing/telephone-marketing/

data-protect

We also highlighted a problem regarding owners data, in this article and the follow up, we looked at the battle going on between the resorts / developers and owners, as to who controls / owns this data.

One of our readers, Edward, wrote part of the first article, here he showed how his resorts community of owners have been trying to use the members database to contact and inform owners of changes at the club. Even the Spanish Data Protection Agency believe that it belongs to the owners and the resorts / developers are only users and custodians of this information.

We all know that lists of members are sold on to others, as we stated in both articles, even Diamond have acknowledged employees and ex-employees have taken data and sold it on. We even explained that for many on the sales staff, keeping records of clients is like an insurance policy, to be used when they no longer have a job. Remember data is a commodity, it can and will be sold, it has yet to be proven if any of this data has been misused by owners committees, that I very much doubt.

Irene also published many articles this month, one was just after the presidential election, this was titled “Dialogue: The Way Forward”.

In this piece she explained how the divisiveness of the election equates to that in the world of timeshare, owners Vs resorts / developers. In the article we address the problem and the only solution, “Dialogue”. The need to work together to ensure that owners and the industry benefit, it is a long shot but somewhere along the line there must be a coming together, if not there will no longer be an industry.

In the article “Illness: Is not a Reason to Surrender your Timeshare” myself and Irene highlighted a very huge problem, that of the elderly and sick. This is a problem for owners on both sides of the great lake, we have seen this with the ongoing story of Mrs B and MacDonald Resorts. Owners unable to use or travel due to illness yet still paying maintenance and being unable to surrender their membership. In some cases they can, but the financial penalty is quite often a huge one, for instance, MacDonald Resorts want 4 years worth of maintenance, but this is not guaranteed, it is if they “allow” you out. (see link below regarding MacDonalds)

http://insidetimeshare.com/macdonald-resorts-reasonable-recompense-relinquishing/

Tauro Beach also came into the news again this week, with the announcement that the Canarian Government was revoking the concession awarded to Anfi Group for the Tauro Beach Project. This follows the prosecution of the former head of the Coastal Authority, the investigation into the Mayor of Mogan over the permissions and licenses given for the project. This will obviously cost Anfi a fortune, not just what they have already spent on it, but the cost of repairing the damage caused. The question is now who will foot the bill, the company or the members with increased maintenance?

Playa-Anfi-Tauro-Canarias-Ahora_EDIIMA20160716_0223_18

So, that is November, it now remains to be seen what happens in December. Although with the Christmas and new year period, it will be a rather quiet month. Inside Timeshare would like to thank Irene and all the other contributors to the articles published this month. These contributions help to make Inside Timeshare more balanced, they also provide a great source of information which might just get missed.

If you require any information on any article published, or you have something we have missed, Inside Timeshare would love to hear from you. If you have a story you would like to share, contact us and we will work with you to publish it.

Tauro Beach Project: Canarian Government Revoke Anfi Concession.

The newspaper La Provincia on 27 November 2016 has published news on the ongoing problems with the Tauro Beach Project, it has been announced that the Canary Island Government is to revoke the concessions awarded to Anfi for the development of this area.

la-provincia

This comes after the investigation started by SEPRONA, the Guardia Civil  Nature Protection Service into irregularities into the licences and permissions that were granted. We have already seen the head of the Coastal Authority, Jose Maria Hernandez, dismissed from his post and facing charges for “Breach of Trust” and Forgery of documents. This case has been declared admissible by Court No3 of San Bartolome de Tirajana. Also an investigation is underway into the Mayor of Mogan, over her involvement.

It transpires that Anfi are being stripped of the concession and being accused of starting the work without providing the correct paperwork. They have also been accused of encroaching on land that was not part of the original project and not completing the project correctly. It appears that they have only laid sand on a fraction of the beach, 1300 sq meters and not the 3811 sq meters as agreed. Environmentalist are also up in arms as the 70,000tonnes of sand imported from the Sahara has not been treated. This according to them means it could contain “invasive species”, which could have a detrimental effect on the local environment.

Playa-Anfi-Tauro-Canarias-Ahora_EDIIMA20160716_0223_18

The current permits allow Anfi to develop the beach area, building hotels, commercial center and beach services for profit, with the concession running for 50 years. Because of the infractions uncovered, the licences and permits will be revoked, with initial proceedings being heard at the local court of San Bartolome de Tirajana.

This is certainly a huge blow for the Anfi Group and the new 50% owners Lopesan. The financial consequences of this could be huge, it may mean that Anfi will have to spend to put things right, but it also means they have lost the huge investments already made in the project.

It now remains to be seen what will happen next, will there be more charges as the investigation continues?

How is this all going to affect Anfi as a whole, will it mean an increase in maintenance to help cover the losses incurred in the project?

As the investigation goes on, Inside Timeshare will bring you the news as it comes out.

Click on the PDF links for the La Provincia article:

costas-abre-expediente-al-grupo-anfi-para-revocarle-la-concesion-de-tauro-la-provincia-diario-de-las-palmas

costas-open-file-to-the-anfi-group-to-revoke-the-granting-of-taurus-the-province-diario-de-las-palmas

Follow these links for more information:

https://m.facebook.com/notes/gran-canaria/surprise-tauro-beach-so-dodgy-the-government-is-taking-it-away/1664104110273792

https://youtu.be/txEIuzIT7M4

http://insidetimeshare.com/first-prosecution-tauro-beach-project-filed/

http://insidetimeshare.com/mayor-mogan-investigation-anfi-tauro-beach-project/

http://insidetimeshare.com/tauro-beach-project-latest-news/

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-tauro-beach-project-people-flooded/

If you have any questions about this story, contact Inside Timeshare and we will be pleased to answer them. If you have any information about this or any other subject Inside Timeshare would like to hear from you.