Browse Month

September 2021

Anfi, The Latest News

Further to our previous article on Anfi and the liquidation of two companies within the Anfi Group, Anfi Sales SL and Anfi Resorts SL, the General Manager of Anfi Group José Luis Trujillo, has published his own announcement. We also bring you the latest news from the courts and a very significant payout for one client.

The news from the Mercantile Court really came as no surprise, it was very much expected, it was just a case of when the news would break. As it happened, it came much quicker than anyone could imagine, so caught a lot of people on the hop.

Anfi is aware, as we all are, that this news will be twisted and used to scare members into parting with huge sums of money by the scam artists who operate on the fringes of timeshare. If you receive any call, text or email and are not sure if it is genuine, Inside Timeshare will be here to help.

In more news from the courts, Canarian Legal Alliance has announced that another client, this time Dutch, is to receive their payment against Anfi Sales and Anfi Resorts from the Courts.

The case was originally heard at the Court of First Instance No 2 of SBT, where the court ordered the contract be declared null and void plus the return of the full payment. The total amount being returned is 67,587.44€ including legal interest and legal costs.

As we have come to expect with all Anfi cases, they did file an appeal with the High Court of Las Palmas, delaying any payment to the client.

But as we have seen time and again, the High Court, in this instance Number 5, dismissed the appeal, confirming 100% the decision made by the Court of First Instance. These judgements are in accordance with the timeshare laws and the ruling on these by the Supreme Court.

The funds are now in the possession of the court and will be disbursed to the client’s account as soon as the legal formalities are concluded by the court financial section. This may have already been done by the time of publication.

The lawyers who prepared and conducted the case are, Adrian Diaz Saavedra Morales and Cristina Batista, with Claims Consultant Kathrine Nilsen assisting the client throughout the process.

For the client, it has been a long-running and often demoralising battle, but now it has reached its conclusion, they can relax, enjoy their money and are now timeshare free. This also now leaves the lawyers free to work on other cases and bring the same success to their other clients.

If you have any questions on this or any other article published, or you would like to know more about the illegalities of timeshare contracts and if you have a possible case, please use our contact page and Inside Timeshare will get back to you.








Timeshare Sales and Finance Agreements

Timeshare is not a cheap product, not just the ongoing costs of the annual maintenance fees, the costs of flights and not to forget the money required to feed and water your family during your stay, but the initial cost is high, to say the least. The average cost of a week’s worth of basic timeshare begins around the £10,000 mark, from many of the legal cases we have highlighted that cost has been two to four times that amount.

For those who became involved with Resort Properties which then became Silverpoint, we have seen figures going as high as £100,000, in some cases more. The reason for these high figures, as we now know, was the “investment” pitch, the purchase of multiple weeks and apartments with the promise of a rental income and then a sale of the weeks for a sizable profit.

These never materialised, a fact we can see in the court cases in Tenerife and the subsequent liquidation of Silverpoint. We also know that it did not end with the first purchase, after the two to three year period when the weeks were eventually to be sold, the unsuspecting “investors” were then told the weeks and apartments they purchased were not popular so were not selling.

Never mind, Silverpoint would take them off your hands and sell you better weeks and apartments, and so it went on.

But how were these huge purchases financed, from many of the statements from these victims, they told the sales staff it was not affordable, but that was not a problem according to the salesman. He and his manager can arrange finance, in this case through Barclays Partner Finance.

It was a simple process and the loan application would be granted without any problems, and so it was. By the end of the presentation, the “victim” had purchased the timeshares and signed the loan application. By the time they returned home, BPF had already sent the letter congratulating them on their purchase and for using BPF!

So what is the problem I hear some of you ask?

The problem is very simple, the loans were granted without all the usual checks that one would expect for a loan ranging from £30k upwards.

This is not unique to Silverpoint, other timeshare sales companies used the same technique to “broker” loans for the purchase, the “guaranteed” acceptance for the loan. All were accepted by the various finance companies they used, without question.

The three main finance institutions involved with timeshare finance are Barclays Partner Finance, Hitachi and Shawbrook Bank. Only Shawbrook Bank has acknowledged they did not do their “due diligence” when authorising these loans. They set aside around £9 million to cover any defaults in repayments for these loans and the then CEO was forced to resign. See the link below on their admission.

So what do we mean by “Due Diligence”?

Very simply put, it is the lender making sure that their money is secure and will be repaid.

How many of you have gone to your bank or a finance company to ask for a loan for a sizable purchase, it may be a new car, an extension to your home, anything where a large loan is required. From personal experience, the loan was never as straightforward as it has been with purchasing a timeshare.

Apart from the simple credit checks, i.e. any CCJs or defaults, proof of income is required, usually, at least the last 3 months pay statements, for yourself and the wife if you are married. Then there is the all-important Income v Expenditure statement, in this, you will show your monthly outgoings, this is everything, from household bills, right down to what you may spend at work for lunches and coffee per month.

From this and the proof of income they can see if the loan repayments are actually affordable, that you have the “spare” income to cover the repayments without leaving you “short”. In other words “responsible lending”.

Shawbrook admitted they had not done this vital part of the application, they and the other finance companies relied on the information provided by the “timeshare sales staff”, who had a vested interest in making sure the loan was approved.

This is now where we have a problem.

It has always been the way in most sales and especially timeshare, that they are commission-based, in other words, no sale no pay. Some timeshare sales did pay a very meagre “basic” but in many instances, these were based using the old “On Target Earnings”, you don’t make your target you don’t get paid.

This means that the pressure to get you to purchase is going to be even stronger, no matter how you may try to explain you cannot afford the price, the loan option is always going to put more pressure on you to sign.

We must also not forget that the salesman also receives a commission from the finance company, so it is a double-dipper for them. Somehow I see a very “unfair relationship” here, the salesman wants the sale and the lender wants the business. After all, the total repayment is around double the original purchase price, these loans are not cheap.

A Typical BPF Loan Agreement showing the total cost of the timeshare with interest.

For the finance companies to rely purely on the information supplied by people with a vested interest in making the sale with a loan, is in our book totally irresponsible. At least Shawbrook admitted as such.

So far in all the cases that Inside Timeshare has seen on this subject, not one client has ever had to show any written proof of income or have had to provide an “income v expenditure” report. At no point has any of this information been provided by the lenders, even though upon request they must produce it, they have not even been able to produce any of this information on the loan application provided by the timeshare sales.

This would suggest that there is a very serious problem here, it also becomes more serious when we look at the loans and the timeshares they were used to purchase. The vast majority were made in Spain, which with their very strict and consumer-friendly timeshare laws, these loans were used to purchase a product that has been deemed illegal according to the law.

For these institutions to be a party to the underhand sales techniques used in timeshare makes them in our opinion worse than the timeshare companies. We have to ask the question, were the finance institutions duped into these loan agreements by timeshare or was it just greed on their part?

Somehow I think your answers will be the same as mine, GREED!

If you purchased a timeshare in Spain after January 1999, then your contract may just be illegal, if you would like to know for certain and the purchase was also made using a finance agreement, then please use our contact page and Inside Timeshare will get back to you.

Mercantile Court Orders Liquidation of Two Anfi Subsidiaries

The news we have been expecting has now been announced, The Mercantile (Commercial) Court Number 1 of Las Palmas, has now agreed to the “declaration of necessary” Bankruptcy, involving Anfi Sales SL and Anfi Resorts SL. Both companies are heavily involved in litigation over their sales of illegal timeshare contracts.

This declaration was requested last year by the company Isla Marina SL, a subsidiary of Lopesan, to Judge Alberto López Villarrubia of the Mercantile Court. The two companies aka “the debtors”, who as we know are part of and controlled by the Santana Cazorla Group, have now had their “powers of administration and disposition of assets” suspended and these are now under the control of the administrators of the case.

Judge Alberto López Villarrubia
of The Mercatile Court Las Palmas

During the course of the case, three “expert” reports were provided on the situation regarding Anfi Sales and Anfi Resorts. Full details can be read on the link to Canarias 7.

In short, the judge endorsed the findings which highlighted a “lack of liquidity and solvency” of the two entities. It was also recalled that in 2019, Anfi Group requested “additional financing” from the bank in order to “refinance a debt” of a syndicated loan. This debt is believed by the expert report to be in the order of 56 million euros.

The report also concluded by “pointing out” that the “financial situation” of the two companies was “ideal”, but also acknowledged that it would most certainly require new “credits or refinancing”.

So where does this leave the legal actions against these two companies?

As we know the leading law firm against Anfi is Canarian Legal Alliance, they currently have around 59 million euros in claims against these companies. According to their own investigations which are also running hand in hand with those being conducted by the authorities, there are sufficient funds and assets to cover these costs.

It is believed that around 400 million euros are currently on the balance sheets, not being a financial genius I am probably as stumped as most of you, considering how Anfi portray themselves as SKINT!.

Yesterday we mentioned the two CLA lawyers who are instrumental in these investigations, no doubt they were already aware of these moves and already had contingency plans formulated for such an event. Now that it is official, they will be able to ensure that all client’s interests are met.

Cristina & Eva, Specialists on Anfi

This breaking news follows on very nicely from Part Five of last week’s series on Anfi, which explored the legal wrangles between the Cazorla Group and Lopesan, also mentioning this particular case. We did not expect an answer as quick as this, so once again it does look as though Lopesan is getting closer to gaining full control of Anfi. A move that we believe can only benefit those with illegal contracts.

This news is likely to begin a series of “cold calls” by some of the more unscrupulous entities, using it as scare tactics to get your business. This placing into administration of the two companies does not affect your membership, the two companies involved are the sales companies which are only responsible for selling the product and not running it. If you receive any calls and are unsure please get in touch with Inside Timeshare, or if you have a case in process, our advice is to contact your own lawyers for information.

If you have an Anfi contract and would like to know if it is indeed illegal under the timeshare laws and what legal rights and options are available to you to seek redress. Please use our contact form and Inside Timeshare will get back to you.

As you have seen on these pages, if the contract is illegal, the courts will declare it null and void, return the full purchase price plus double any deposit taken, leaving you timeshare and maintenance-free. Don’t forget, you can still book Anfi using other methods, usually a lot cheaper than your maintenance.

Canarias 7 link