Browse Tag

Mrs Tove Grimsbo

truth 1

Anfi: The Legal Battle hots up!

Just recently Inside Timeshare was sent an email from a reader who is an Anfi member, it was regarding a video interview posted by a Norwegian Anfi member. In the video he berates the Arguineguin law firm Canarian Legal Alliance, who we must remember have been instrumental in having the timeshare laws in Spain clarified through the many Supreme Court rulings they have achieved over the past two years.

It turns out that this member had sought legal advice from Canarian Legal Alliance, with the view of regaining his purchase price and having his contract declared null and void. But for some reason he decided not to go ahead.

Anfi have also employed a Public Relations company, Geelmuyden Kiese AS, this company has been deemed the task of putting a “spin” on the problems that Anfi are having with all the lawsuits and adverse publicity. It was this company which wrote the letter to Norwegian members on behalf of Anfi, it was signed by the CEO Jose Luis Trujillo who then sent the letter to members with quotes from Mr Aksel Malterud along with the video. Mr Malterud in one quote goes on to say that “CLA pretends to be a law firm”, well I just wonder what the registered lawyers of CLA think about that one?

This letter is another step in the continuing battle Anfi are waging against CLA, still they deny any wrongdoing or that they have lost any cases. The ones they have mentioned losing, they claim the judges have got the law wrong.

lies

It must also be asked why has this PR firm taken on this case, after all have the Scandinavian press not run many stories on these cases, including the now famous case of Mrs Tove Grimsbo, the very first Supreme Court ruling?

Could it be they have not done their homework, and believe whatever they are told in order to get the business from a client who is clearly in the wrong?

We leave you to decide the answer to that question. After all, we have all come across this type of “spin” before, it follows the old saying “keep telling the lie long enough then everyone will believe it is the truth”.

From information received, these are the facts which it would appear the PR company Geelmuyden Kiese do not know:

Mr Malterud still owes for services and legal work done up to this point.

He has by all accounts never paid, which leaves CLA no other option than to take out legal proceedings for the outstanding legal fees. For whatever reason he decided not to take the case any further his subsequent actions leave a lot to be desired, CLA have evidence written by him claiming the underhand way Anfi was sold to him, the fact he was sold a contract that the courts have deemed illegal. Had he known this at the time, along with the fact that what was sold to him was worth nothing, he wouldn’t of signed.

Yet now he appears to be on the side of Anfi, so it does beg the question why?

What incentives has he been offered?

Anfi after all, are losing daily in the courts, only just recently 25/10/17 they had to payout a Norwegian client 136,000€ which was 106,000€ more than he had originally paid. Inside Timeshare has published many articles regarding these court cases, all have been verified by the courts and are genuine.

These figures also have been verified:

  • 32 First instance rulings against Anfi
  • 41 High Court rulings against Anfi
  • 32 Supreme Court rulings against Anfi
  • 1,210,169.11€ Pay-outs from Anfi to former Anfi timeshare owners
  • 5,516,694.81€-  already instructed by the courts to be returned by Anfi
  • 61,646,867.62€ Total claim amounts against Anfi

It was also announced last week that 3 pretrials were held at the Court of San Bartolomé de Tirajana, the judge ruled that there was no need to take them to full trial, his reason was the contracts were in breach of all the rulings made by the Supreme Court. The judge then announced he would deliver the sentence himself in due course.

With information such as this being made public, it really is not surprising that Anfi will do everything in its power to discredit a very successful law firm. Inside Timeshare say to all our readers, before you decide what the truth is, just remember where it comes from. If you want to believe Anfi, that is up to you, but remember what you were told when purchasing, all the promises that never came to fruition.

We have also published some of the history of the Anfi Group and the legal battles over the years, especially the most recent events surrounding the debacle of the Tauro Beach Project, which is currently under investigation by the authorities. The former head of the Coastal Authority is the first to be charged for forging documents and malpractice in public office. We would not be surprised to see more charges being filed with the courts over what has become a nightmare for the local residents.

We also published a similar story back in June, again it was a letter to members from the CEO Jose Luis Trujillo (see link below). For more articles on the subject of Anfi over the years including the story of the Tauro Beach Project just enter Anfi in the search box.

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-ceos-letter-members-desperation/

lie2

tribunal supremo

Timeshare In the Press

Following on from some of the previous articles regarding court cases and the fact that many of the timeshare companies are denying they have taken place, El Diario, a Spanish newspaper has published an article which confirms these cases are genuine.

(Bring up the link below, right click on the article and choose translate)

eldiario

http://www.eldiario.es/canariasahora/tribunales/sentencias-Supremo-contratos-timesharing-Tenerife_0_677182619.html

In their article entitled “Eight Supreme Court rulings annul in one month `timesharing´ contracts in Tenerife for more than 400,000 euros”, they explain the cases against Silverpoint. El Diario explain that the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court issued in the space of 10 days, between Monday 10 July and Thursday 20 July, a total of eight judgements against Silverpoint.

They go on to state that since the start of the year Canarian Legal Alliance has accumulated 18 rulings from the Supreme Court against this one company alone. Many of these cases had been won at the Court of First Instance, were then taken to the High Court on appeal and eventually to the Supreme Court, which returns a verdict in favour of the customer.

Silverpoints contention that these consumers are “investors” has in the past been accepted by the High Court in Santa Cruz de Tenerife, with the Supreme Court overturning that verdict. Silverpoint still contend that they sold a product which consumers eventually would sell and return a “profit”, making them “investors”.

What the Supreme Court has stated is these “consumers” for a substantial amount of money have purchased the right to use with annual maintenance fees, along with the addition of the possibility of resale. The court believes that this firmly brings the product into the scope of the law 42/98 on timeshare, and therefore they are afforded the full protection of the law as consumers.

The difference between what Silverpoint have been selling and that sold by other companies is quite simple, Silverpoint have on their presentations sold the product with the express promise of a sale in two years, in which the consumer will make at least a 15% profit. We all know that part of the sales pitch is “when you no longer want to use it you can sell it”, “that it will go up in value”. The fact is, according to the EU directives on timeshare it should not be sold as an investment.

Silverpoint have stated that they will take these cases to the High Court of Justice of the European Union and the Constitutional Court of Spain. From our understanding, the Constitutional Court only deals with matters regarding the constitution and not civil matters, which the timeshare law is. As for the EU High Court of Justice, will they not be bound to uphold the Timeshare Directives issued by the European Union?

Another publication to highlight the rulings of the Supreme Court, is the English language newspaper The Canary News. Last Friday 18 August, they published a translated version of the article in La Provincia, another Spanish newspaper.

the-canary-news-views-sunshine-logo-2016-250

http://thecanarynews.com/supreme-court-ruling-continues-to-tempt-thousands-of-timeshare-clients-to-file-lawsuits-for-fraud/

It starts with a recap of the groundbreaking case of Mrs Tove Grimsbo against Anfi, brought by the CLA lawyer Miguel Rodriguez Ceballos. This case opened the door for thousands of timeshare owners to annul their contracts and seek justice, following years of flouting the law by the timeshare companies.

miguel1
Miguel Rodriguez Ceballos

So once again we have to ask the question “who is telling the truth, do you believe the timeshare companies who have for years misled consumers, or do you believe the news from the courts published in various journals”?

We know who we believe, the evidence is there in black and white, not just published in newspapers but by the courts themselves in the official bulletins which make the rulings public. The timeshare companies have only themselves to blame for their present predicament, for too long they have believed they were above the law, by continuing their denial of these facts they are just destroying for good a once decent product.

http://insidetimeshare.com/supreme-court-rules-silverpoint-twice-one-week/

http://insidetimeshare.com/truth-what-is-truth/

If you have any questions about this subject, or want to know if you have an illegal contract and are eligible to bring a case and how to do so, contact Inside Timeshare and we will point you in the right direction.

Do you have a story about your experiences and would like to share, then we would like to hear from you. This is your forum to be heard, with your contributions we can publish the truth about what is going on in the world of timeshare.

Digging deeper to the truth this person finds nothing but lies.

Truth, What is Truth?

Over the past few weeks, Inside Timeshare has received many enquiries regarding Anfi and who is telling the truth regarding the court cases and Supreme Court rulings. Many of these questions have been coming from Anfi members themselves, having received emails and letters from Anfi who deny anything is going on. So the question is what is the truth?

According to a letter sent by the CEO of Anfi Group in June, which we published in the following article:

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-ceos-letter-members-desperation/

mahatma-gandhi-quote-an-error-does-not-become-truth-by-reason-of

Anfi deny any wrongdoing, they continue to state they are not losing court cases, that the Supreme Court stated that Anfi were acting in good faith when selling perpetuity contracts. This in itself is a little strange as the Supreme Court has verified that the law 42/98 which states that contracts must be of a maximum 50 years, is correct. In other words why would this court say that perpetuity contracts are illegal, then on the other hand that Anfi acted in good faith?

According to the CEO, Anfi members are asking for their help in getting out of court cases instigated by various law firms, again this does not ring true, after all having used legal services in the past, you employ the law firm, if you wish to withdraw that is your right. You don’t need any help, especially from Anfi. Is this yet another deception?

In another section of his letter he goes on to say the Supreme Court agrees that any member who has had their contract declared null & void should in principle pay for past holidays taken. Inside Timeshare has not seen any evidence of this, in fact this point has been going on for some time, with even the RDO publishing their support for this. Again it is another ploy by the timeshare industry to save itself!

We won’t dwell on the CEO’s letter as you can read the previous article.

Another couple contacted Inside Timeshare after receiving an email about their own membership. It would seem this particular couple are not happy with their purchase, and wish to terminate the agreement. It starts by stating that Anfi does not consider their contract to be illegal until a court deems it so.

Again this flies in the face of previous statements, that their contracts are legal and it is the courts that have got it wrong, the truth is, the courts have found the contracts have infringed the timeshare law, is this another untruth?

In this email Anfi state once again that they are not losing, that cases which have been lost at the Court of First Instance are going to appeal. Yes they may be going to appeal, but only to prolong the process. After all, now that the Supreme Court has made 57 rulings against various timeshare companies, of which around 32 have been made against Anfi, all the courts must abide by them regardless. If the law has been broken then that is that!

On the point of one part of the law, the taking of deposits within the 14 day cooling off period, in this particular email, Anfi deny taking any deposit for the sale of the timeshare. They say they have a signed reservation form for so many nights accommodation at their Hotel Gran Anfi. Hang on a minute, is it not a timeshare resort?

Regardless of that point, according to them there is no mention on the documentation that it forms part of the payment for membership. Bit of a moot point there, after all the timeshare law states that no payment shall be taken on the day the contract is signed, even by a third party. So one could interpret that as the payment taken at the time of signing, even for accommodation, is payment to a third party! We’ll leave that one for the judges to decide.

legal clipart

The tone of the email is not very pleasant, the writer states “Our company is strongly focused on the future, and the goal is to have only loyal members”, well not very conducive to customer relations, would you not agree?

Well, let’s get down to some facts, Inside Timeshare during its investigations over the months has come up with the following figures. These may just be a little out of date as they were compiled some months ago and many more court cases have taken place since.

Cases lost by Anfi upto June 2017

Court                                              1st Instance                2nd Instance           High               Court Supreme
2015                                                      11                                      2                         18                               3

2016                                                       8                                      0                         17                              27

2017                                                       9                                       1                           4                               2
______________________________________________________________________
Total                                                     28                                     3                         39                              32

Remember, it was in March 2015, that the first Supreme Court ruling was made against Anfi, this was the case of the Norwegian lady Mrs Tove Grimsbo. Or is this another fact that Anfi are not acknowledging?

It is estimated that since January 2015 the courts have awarded over 3,435,974.56€ to former Anfi clients.

Only last week one client was awarded their purchase price back, 27,895€ by the Court of First Instance Number 2, in Maspalomas. That same court also ordered that double the deposit was to be paid back which amounted to 28,611€. Plus the legal fees, so this client receives back more than they originally paid. The infringement was again for a contract in perpetuity, longer than 50 years, so again another untruth told by Anfi that their contracts are legal!

Also we must ask about the recent Anfi vote, which asked members to vote for new contracts which comply with the law, it goes against what the CEO and the writer of the email state, that their contracts are not illegal.

Follow the links below for previous articles on this vote.

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-sgm-what-are-they-up-to/

http://insidetimeshare.com/anfi-special-general-meeting-vote/

In the article on the last link there are figures that were supplied to Inside Timeshare that show payouts, cases won, closed and ready for execution. We leave it to you the reader to decide what the truth is, we already know.

truth

truth next exit

Anfi CEO’s Letter to Members: Desperation or What!

In a letter to members of Anfi, the CEO Jose Luis Trujillo, looks like he is getting desperate. In this letter he states several “facts” which if you have been following the story of the legal battles involving this company, will find rather hard to believe.

He rambles on about the sales activities of some law firms, none have been named, that they are being aggressive, as if the Anfi sales techniques are not aggressive. That members want Anfi to help them get out of court cases instigated by these law firms.

Well, hang on here, if those people didn’t want to sign up for legal action, why did they, surely they were not subject to the same techniques used on timeshare presentations?

Also, unlike a timeshare, clients are employing the services of the lawyers, and as such can withdraw at any time.

 

He states in one paragraph, “We are sorry that these law firms have been harassing you”, as if in timeshare, clients are never harassed to continually upgrade.

He goes on to state that in addition to “aggressive” sales methods, prospective clients are not being told the truth. Wow, that is the pot calling the kettle black! Anfi not losing cases, so where has all this news come from that they have lost?

As for not trying to fool anyone, what about all the promises made when on the sales presentation, promises which never materialised, promises which clients subsequently found out where false? A typical one heard so often from many readers is the “promise that Anfi would buy back your week at the price you paid, when you no longer need it”! No what they then do is place it on the resale market for a pittance.

tribunal supremo

As for the Supreme Court stating “Anfi acted in good faith when selling perpetuity contracts”, somehow this does not seem possible as this court has continually enforced Article 3. On Duration which clearly states that the contract should be no longer than 50 years. So why would the court declare “acting in good faith” when law 42/98, which they are upholding says different?

This once again reiterates Anfi’s belief that those learned Judges at the Supreme Court misinterpreted that very law! It is quite clear 50 years is the maximum duration, so how could that be misinterpreted?

If this was the case, why is Anfi holding a Special General Meeting on 23 June with a ballot to change contracts to comply? Does this statement by the CEO mean the opposite?

As for the legal fees going up, according to our sources this is a fabrication. From what we have been told by lawyers and clients, the fees paid at the start have never gone up, no matter how long the case lasts. In fact, one only need to ask Mrs Tove Grimsbo, whose case took many years and was the first Supreme Court ruling.

Another point is that clients only have to attend court if Anfi demand it, that said it is their right to do so. But what is the reason behind that? Simple, to prolong the case, to cause disruption and stress to the claimant, all in the hope they will withdraw.

Another “scare tactic” is Anfi state once again that the Supreme Court has accepted the principle that any client whose contract is declared null & void should compensate Anfi for the holidays they have taken over the years of membership. We at Inside Timeshare have never heard of this from the Supreme Court, so show us the written proof from the Supreme Court.

The whole letter is a deception from a CEO whose company is losing millions of Euros for past transgressions of the law. An attempt to divert attention from the known facts that they are losing, the fact that since the very first Supreme Court Ruling in March 2015, they have had a massive 34 made against them! As far as we are aware not one Supreme Court ruling has gone in their favour.

At the end of the day it is your choice, take legal action or not, keep your timeshare or not, it is more of a choice than when you were first coerced into purchasing!

Just read the many article about Anfi published here, they give you the full story from over the years, right up to the debacle that is Tauro Beach!

Inside Timeshare leaves it to you the reader to decide who is actually telling the truth.

Gandhi truth

Right click the following images and open in new tab for enlarged copy.

a  anfi2

week review

End of the Week Review.

We started this week with Irene’s article on Consumer Protection Week in the US, we end with another.

While in Europe and especially Spain, we have seen more news coming from the Supreme Court. At the start of the week it was announced that Silverpoint formerly Resort Properties, have been ordered to pay back 169,000€. This was announced in the Spanish newspaper El Diario (see link), the Spanish press have been very fast to publicise these rulings, which have gone virtually unnoticed in the UK press.

http://www.eldiario.es/canariasahora/tribunales/Varapalo-Supremo-timesharing-comercializado-Canarias_0_619088490.html

In another case, the Supreme Court ruled against the same company for infringements of the timeshare laws for a German client. In this particular case the court again stated that the client was a consumer not an investor as Silverpoint had claimed. The client’s contract was declared null and void and awarded over 30,000€.

These cases have been brought by the Canarian law firm Canarian Legal Alliance, who so far since the first Supreme Court ruling 2 years ago, have secured over 3 million euros for their clients, with over 1.2 million euros already in the accounts of the clients.

CLA Logo

To celebrate the 2nd birthday of the first ruling, the Norwegian lady who made legal history visited the lawyers who fought her case. Mrs Tove Grimsbo, had an epic battle which lasted several years, her case was highlighted extensively in the Scandinavian press, but through the perseverance of her lawyers she eventually won through.

 

http://insidetimeshare.com/meredith-pritchard-new-exit-claims-company/

So on to Irene Parker’s End of Consumer Protection Week article.
End of Consumer Protection Week March 5 – 11

By Irene Parker

satisfied

Consumer Protection Week ends today. Here are some tips on purchasing and owning a timeshare. Timeshare is a good product for some but it does not work for everyone.

“Buyer Beware!”  The psychological methods used by some timeshare companies and agents are designed to wear the consumer down – difficult to overcome even by the strongest individual. “My personal opinion, working as a sales agent for Diamond Resorts and Hyatt, convinced me that greed and making the sale at any cost is the corporate culture. I saw manipulation, threats, deceit and fraud used to make sales. When you have a good product, these methods are not necessary to make the sale,” reported one former timeshare sales agent.

Do your homework. Few will buy a house or car without some comparison shopping. Contact a member of the Licensed Timeshare Resale Broker Association to compare developer versus secondary market prices and benefit or lack of benefits when buying a “used” timeshare.

http://www.licensedtimeshareresalebrokers.org/

Ask yourself if the “FREE GIFT” is really worth signing a perpetual contract, accompanied by perpetual maintenance fees, in a same day sale, with little or no secondary market.  Most timeshare companies do not offer buy-back programs and voluntary surrenders are not guaranteed.

If you are a timeshare owner who feels you were lied to or deceived in your timeshare purchase, and if resolution is not achieved after contacting your resort:

File a complaint with the Attorneys General of the state where you signed your contract, where you live, and where the resort is domiciled.

http://www.naag.org/naag/attorneys-general/whos-my-ag.php

File a complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau under the mortgage option (even if no mortgage).

https://www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint/

In some states the standard of fraud is as simple as dealing honestly and fairly. In such states, if you were lied to, the contract is fraudulent.

We should begin now planning for Consumer Protection Week 2018. Consumer Protection Week should provide a benchmark as we set goals today that can be measured next year. Goals that can determine where and how timeshare business practices have improved.

As Irene said, do your homework, anything to do with timeshare is a minefield, from first purchase, to resale companies and then to all the so-called legal and claims companies that are now proliferating, especially in Europe following the rulings made by the Spanish Supreme Court.

There are so many companies jumping on that particular band wagon, some are very sophisticated operations, such as Litigious Abogados (see link for the last article, or search Litigious Abogados in the search box for all articles).

http://insidetimeshare.com/litigious-abogados-plot-gets-thicker/

Another facebook group has also got off to a flying start (see link below), it is a closed group but welcomes new members. It is a forum for dialogue and debate, taking a different approach to many of these groups that use social media, by encouraging opposing views. They have even welcomed a Diamond sales agent, who has even agreed with some of the owners views on sales practices. This is what is needed if timeshare is to change.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/DiamondResortsOwnersAdvocacy/

So there we have it, thank you to Irene and all the contributors in the US, also to the readers who have supplied information on some of the companies we have researched. It is your information that is helping others to negotiate this murky world of timeshare. Have a good weekend.

friday-again

end-year

2016 End of Year Review

So here we are at the end of another year and what a year it has been, it started with the relaunch of Inside Timeshare, bringing you truthful information and news you would otherwise not get.

One of our first articles explained what fly buys are, the fact you would get a cheap holiday but be subject to attending a presentation. At this you would be pitched a holiday product of some sort, be it a holiday club or timeshare. The article also warned of the pitfalls of not attending the presentation, either being charged the full accommodation price and in many cases being removed from the resort.

We also highlighted many “scams” that timeshare owners have been subjected to over the years including many new ones. The latest being the article on Litigious Abogados (see links). We also showed how some of the so-called resale companies operate, giving you the reader the information to make an informed choice.

http://insidetimeshare.com/1059-2/

http://insidetimeshare.com/litigious-abogados-update/

http://insidetimeshare.com/litigious-abogados-latest-information/

CLA Logo

Another theme Inside Timeshare published was the on-going woes of Anfi, the first article titled: “The Great ANFI Battle of the Partners”, explained the story of the two partners in the Anfi empire, the Lyngs and the Cazorlas. We then published the story of legal history being made with the very first Supreme Court ruling, this was the case of the Norwegian lady, Mrs Tove Grimsbo and her battle with Anfi. The case was brought on her behalf by Canarian Legal Alliance.

Since that auspicious occasion, Canarian Legal Alliance has gone from strength to strength, securing 36 rulings from the Highest Court in Spain, 29 of these have been against Anfi. Others have been against TasolanPalm Oasis and Holiday Club Puerto Calma, with the ruling against Puerto Calma confirming the Fractional did indeed come under Timeshare Laws. This resulted in around 243,000 Euros being returned to a British client.

There have also been 24 High Court and 21 Local Court rulings against various timeshare companies including Resort Properties / Silverpoint and Club La Costa. Some of these Courts have been in Maspalomas, Arona, Barcelona and Fuengirola. There are approximately 800 live cases in various courts and over 2000 clients. The total claim value is around 80 million Euro, with 117.208.00 Euros reclaimed per month, there are on average 2 to 3 cases per week being heard.

(These figures are what we have on file, there have obviously been more cases, but we have yet to receive an update).

This is certainly an impressive achievement by this law firm, who has in the past suffered from some very negative press instigated by the industry itself. Inside Timeshare congratulates the whole team at Canarian Legal Alliance, including the clients who in some cases have waited years for these results.

Another series of articles have been about MacDonald Resorts and the ongoing battle of Mrs B, now known as Mrs Price. It is a case that has riled us at Inside Timeshare, who are fighting on her behalf. The story revolves around MacDonald Resorts refusal to accept that she no longer owns a timeshare at Dona Lola in Spain, continuing to harass this 87 year old via a debt collecting agency Network Credit Services. This harassment has included threats of court action to recover a debt that is not owed, this case has been referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Inside Timeshare will continue to highlight this case until MacDonald Resorts abandon the chase for money. It must also be noted that the RDO, which is the industry trade body has also washed their hands of this company.

In the April article “The Resurrected” a warning was issued about an old company from Fuengirola had come back to life. It is the story of Ramirez and Ramirez, who several years ago were very active in deceiving many timeshare and holiday club members out of thousands for bogus claims. It must be said that very little has been heard of them since.

Mark of excellence

We have also had a few light hearted moments, although they did come with a serious message. In the spoof article “A New Member to EGTBW”, it explained about the trade bodies for the timeshare industry operate. This was extremely fun to write and gave many people a good laugh, the only problem was that it was actually based on fact.

http://insidetimeshare.com/new-member-egtbw/

Back in July we started to publish the ongoing story of the Tauro Beach Project, the fact that irregularities had been uncovered and an investigation had been started by the Guardia Civil Nature Protection Service (SEPRONA). As the story unfolded the Head of The Canarian Coastal Authority had been dismissed and is now awaiting trial for wrong doing in public office and forgery of official documents. Then in August we published the story of the local inhabitants and their homes being flooded, this instigated further investigations which also include the local mayor. The story continues. (search Tauro Beach for further information).

We also teamed up with Irene Parker in the United States, she has provided some valuable information and interesting articles on the world of timeshare across the Great Lake. Below is her latest article.

What Timeshare Owners Can Look forward to:

Timeshare Lawsuits 2017

By Irene Parker,  December 26, 2016

2017

Our Inside Timeshare mission is to offer timeshare owners accurate reporting on both the good and bad aspects of timeshare today. While we admit we bear more to the negative side of timeshare reporting, this thirteen page report from the US Department of Justice listing timeshare scams explains why:

https://search.justice.gov/search?query=timeshare+fraud&op=Search&affiliate=justice

The other reason is because the industry is not well regulated. Timeshare owners do not have the level of organization or funds necessary to compete with timeshare developer lobbyists. Lobbyists used to primarily direct their efforts towards influencing lawmakers, but more and more efforts are now being directed towards influencing US Attorneys general:

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/29/us/lobbyists-bearing-gifts-pursue-attorneys-general.html

Looking to 2017, we need to look back and reflect on timeshare’s unresolved and continuing legal battles. Timeshare developers, former timeshare sales agents and  solicitors, timeshare owners, federal and state regulators and advocates continue to weigh in on possible changes that will make timesharing more owner friendly and less predatory.

Will the final piece of this legal and regulatory puzzle result in a less aggressive and deceptive industry – or will practices continue unabated and unchecked resulting in more of the same?

round-table

Westgate

Westgate is facing lawsuits in several jurisdictions and a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Investigation. Allegations include fraudulent and deceptive business practices ranging from high pressure sales tactics, failure to honor timely rescission requests, elder abuse, illegal debt collection practices and impermissible telephone solicitations.” The Capitol Forum June 27, 2016

https://www.buzzfeed.com/matthewzeitlin/financial-regulators-are-looking-into-americas-largest-times?utm_term=.pbyQ8MPbx#.pmA2BeVyM

Colorado Attorney General

Colorado Attorney General Cynthia H. Coffman is suing Highlands Resort, Sedona Pines and twelve other defendants for deceptive trade practices.

Another US Attorney General Exposes Deceptive Tactics.

Wyndham $20 Million

Former Wyndham sales agent Trish Williams was awarded $20 million for exposing deceptive sales practices. While the amount will probably be reduced on appeal, it sends a message that courts and juries are listening.  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/25/business/my-soul-feels-taller-a-whistle-blowers-20-million-vindication.html?_r=0

Hyatt

Candace Czarny and two other former Hyatt timeshare agents would like to see the industry improved. They are in year five of a class action alleging deceptive practice.

http://insidetimeshare.com/whistleblowers-expose-timeshare-sales-tactics/

The Manhattan Club

Attorney Douglass Wasser represents 30 Manhattan Club defendants.

“To my knowledge there has been no dismissal of any Manhattan Club proceeding at this point.  The NY Attorney General investigation is proceeding, and the motion to dismiss a currently pending class action suit has been adjourned to January 5, 2017 for now. Three prior class action suits at the Manhattan Club have been dismissed.  But, at least for the time being, the current class action still survives,” Mr. Wasser reported November 15. 2016

http://www.reuters.com/article/manhattan-club-ruling-idUSL1N18U0DL

Marriott Racketeering

“The Marriott racketeering lawsuit seeks to abolish Marriott’s points program, which attorney said is unique among timeshare companies. It also seeks the return of fees and costs paid by buyers.” Paul Brinkmann reported October 13, 2016 for the The Orlando Sentinel.

 http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/brinkmann-on-business/os-marriott-timeshare-racketeering-20161013-story.html

Diamond Resorts

A recent class action was filed against Diamond Resorts:

https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/lawsuit-news/348667-diamond-resorts-class-action-high-pressure-timeshare-sales-deceptive/

Matt Daniel Finazzo, et al. v. Diamond Resorts International Club Inc., Case No. 5:16-cv-02256, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

holidays-are-hereI don’t mean to be the Grinchess that stole Christmas, so to end on a positive note,

People are listening!

Charles Thomas and I are hearing from people all over the world who are joining forces to work towards:

  • A legitimate secondary market
  • Less aggressive and deceptive selling
  • Less predatory lending

Thank you from timeshare owners to our regulators and lawyers working to protect us. Human leverage and a clearinghouse of information exchange is the answer.

inside final small

So that is the end of 2016, we hope you will join us in 2017 and also help us to get the news out to others. Without your information many of the articles, particularly on possible scam or bogus companies will not be published. So from the Charles and Irene, we wish you a very happy and prosperous New Year.

happy-new-year