The world of timeshare is full of controversy, from perpetuity contracts to owners being forced to continue paying maintenance fees even when unable to do so due to age etc. One of these is the ongoing argument between MacDonald Resorts and various owners groups, the most recent being Villacana.
There is an ongoing argument between these two parties that has been running for several years, this has resulted in the MacDonalds Resorts Legal Action Group, MRLAG. This has been set up to fight the proposals by MacDonald Resorts to transfer all fixed week fixed apartment owners to floating weeks. Now this does seem surprising as floating weeks have been declared illegal in Spain.
So why are the owners against this, apart from floating being illegal?
It would seem it is about control. They have seen this from other resorts where this was pushed through. As fixed week fixed apartment owners they have a say in the running of the resort, after all they are technically the owners. When a company like MacDonalds changes to floating weeks they basically become the owners of the fixed weeks and apartments, which then gives them control.
With many of the other resorts where this has happened, the main argument was that the owners did not want to go ahead with the proposal. But the votes have not gone their way, many owners complaining that MacDonalds received the necessary vote because they controlled any vote not cast by a member, either in person or by proxy. Not to forget that the resort developers control any votes for weeks not sold. (see previous article)
The other point in this argument is that the floating weeks do not guarantee a holiday as they are subject to availability. Also MacDonalds as the controlling owners have the right to sell or rent these weeks as they see fit, even to non members, and at the member’s expense, plus while still enjoying your maintenance fees.
Then we have the problem of getting out of your timeshare, we all know that there is no resale market. But MacDonalds offer what can be described as a derisory solution. Every two years offering a limited number to hand back their timeshare, but at the cost of 4 years maintenance.
The TCA have been highlighting this for some time with regular updates.
So what of TATOC in all of this?
Well as we know TATOC is supposed to represent the timeshare owners committees, in other words you. But as we have seen they are throwing their full weight behind the MacDonalds Proposal. For those of you who are not in the know, TATOC receive the bulk of their funding from the timeshare industry, such as MacDonalds Resorts who pay annual fees to be “ACREDITED” by TATOC.
Somehow I don’t think this is actually in the interests of you the owners / members. I agree that the owners committees should have good relations with the resort developer, but this should be on an equal partnership. After all it is your money that is paying for it and keeping the resorts open and maintained.
It certainly seems that it is time for new organisations and associations to be set up to serve your interests, as well as a new and non industry related body to oversee the developers and resorts. So get rid of TATOC and The RDO, then you may at last have some say as well as justice.
If you have any questions or thoughts on this subject Inside Timeshare would be pleased to hear from you. If you want any information regarding any timeshare matter we will try to answer it, if we don´t know we will find it out.