Browse Category

News

My Thoughts Today End of June

So here we are the end of another month and half way through the year, and what a month it´s been. More rulings from the Supreme Court, more clients awarded substantial amounts and even more cases in the pipeline.

 

The article published 13 June 2016, regarding maintenance arrears and debt collectors has had a great response. Lots of support for the plight of Mrs B, including some personal messages from some legal eagles on how to help her, for that Inside Timeshare is grateful.

 

So far there has been no contact from Network Credit Services, even though they gave her a final notice to pay up within 7 days. Since then she has had her phone connected to BT Call Guardian, so she can block any unwanted calls. Having spoken with her today she is in good spirits especially after giving her the news of support coming in from many different quarters.

debt collectors

On the point of timeshare companies actually going to court for maintenance arrears, Inside Timeshare has been advised from a reliable source that one company has indeed done so. The owner actually had court officials knocking on his door to enforce the order to pay Anfi the arrears. We are waiting for written confirmation of this. Again are these companies by-passing the Spanish legal system to enforce payments, due to the fact that under Spanish law those contracts are illegal and unenforceable? Is it a case that the courts in the UK need to get a grip and realise what is going on?

 

There is still no news from the courts regarding the RCI Action, being brought by Edwin Coe LLP. As stated before the wheels of the law do move at a rather slow pace, but when we find out we will let you know.

 

On 14 June 2016, the spoof article on the new member to the blog writers trade association was published, it was fun to write and certainly made people laugh. But underlying the article was a very important point, this has been borne out by some of the comments received. It was very surprising to find how many people actually agreed with it. Yes it was scathing, but that was point. A trade body set up to regulate an industry should do just that, not allow its members to do as they wish and ignore the laws that are in place to protect the consumer.

 

The TCA also published an article about Silverpoint Vacations (an RDO member), losing at the courts in Tenerife. The full translation of the document shows the case was another to do with the perpetuity contract being illegal. In their article the TCA do state which company brought the case on behalf of the client. But it does show the courts are finding on behalf of the consumer.

 

Also this month we have highlighted a company which is stating they can claim against the timeshare companies. From the many enquiries received and the information given by those who have attended meetings, our first impressions have been found correct. Again this goes to show that in-depth research is required in order to safeguard yourself.

on holiday 2

The summer holiday season is also now upon us, for those travelling to Europe, the only advice is beware the ticket touts. Remember if you do decide to purchase anything such as timeshare or one of the numerous holiday clubs, it is illegal to take any payments within the 14 DAY COOLING OFF PERIOD. Do your due diligence, if it sounds too good to be true, alarm bells should ring. If you are unsure, then don’t sign. Happy holidays.

Maintenance Arrears and Debt Collectors.

Further to Fridays Article 10 June 2016, Inside Timeshare has been doing a little digging. The TCA published a list in August 2015 of timeshare companies that have threatened legal action to force payment of the maintenance fees. The first part of the list are those that have threatened legal action using either debt collectors or solicitors, in some cases even bogus lawyers.

tca logo

The above companies have made the threats, but as far as can be ascertained have never actually taken any case to court.

The following companies have taken legal action but what the success rate has been is at present unknown.

So where do you the owners actually stand?

Keep Reading

Breaking News: Its A Strike!

Well, well, well, they just seem to keep on coming, it was announced yesterday, 7 June 2016 by CLA of yet another judgement by the Spanish Supreme Court.

victory2

This now brings the number made to an incredible TEN, with apparently many more waiting to be heard. The latest ruling is again against Anfi, this time the client is English. In this ruling the court once again reaffirmed that Floating Weeks are illegal, also reaffirming their previous rulings that contracts in Perpetuity are also illegal.

 

The court has awarded them over 20,000€ plus all legal expenses.

 

Yet another blow to the timeshare industry, and they still believe that these ruling are wrong. How many more will it take for them to realise that the game is up, that they should now put their house in order and start playing by the rules. It is only a matter of time before other States in the EU implement the same rulings. Once this happens we will see cases being brought for timeshares not sold in Spain.

 

Once again congratulations to this particular client and well done the Legal team at CLA.

champagne

If you require any information, or have any comments Inside Timeshare would like to hear from you, if we don’t know the answer we will find it.

 

The Villacana Story: A Repeat of Past Deeds.

The world of timeshare is full of controversy, from perpetuity contracts to owners being forced to continue paying maintenance fees even when unable to do so due to age etc. One of these is the ongoing argument between MacDonald Resorts and various owners groups, the most recent being Villacana.

villacana

There is an ongoing argument between these two parties that has been running for several years, this has resulted in the MacDonalds Resorts Legal Action Group, MRLAG. This has been set up to fight the proposals by MacDonald Resorts to transfer all fixed week fixed apartment owners to floating weeks. Now this does seem surprising as floating weeks have been declared illegal in Spain.

 

So why are the owners against this, apart from floating being illegal?

 

It would seem it is about control. They have seen this from other resorts where this was pushed through. As fixed week fixed apartment owners they have a say in the running of the resort, after all they are technically the owners. When a company like MacDonalds changes to floating weeks they basically become the owners of the fixed weeks and apartments, which then gives them control.

mcdonaldsresortlogo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With many of the other resorts where this has happened, the main argument was that the owners did not want to go ahead with the proposal. But the votes have not gone their way, many owners complaining that MacDonalds received the necessary vote because they controlled any vote not cast by a member, either in person or by proxy. Not to forget that the resort developers control any votes for weeks not sold. (see previous article)

Manipulation of votes by resorts and resort owners

The other point in this argument is that the floating weeks do not guarantee a holiday as they are subject to availability. Also MacDonalds as the controlling owners have the right to sell or rent these weeks as they see fit, even to non members, and at the member’s expense, plus while still enjoying your maintenance fees.

 

Then we have the problem of getting out of your timeshare, we all know that there is no resale market. But MacDonalds offer what can be described as a derisory solution. Every two years offering a limited number to hand back their timeshare, but at the cost of 4 years maintenance.

 

The TCA have been highlighting this for some time with regular updates.

 

So what of TATOC in all of this?tatoc logo

 

Well as we know TATOC is supposed to represent the timeshare owners committees, in other words you. But as we have seen they are throwing their full weight behind the MacDonalds Proposal. For those of you who are not in the know, TATOC receive the bulk of their funding from the timeshare industry, such as MacDonalds Resorts who pay annual fees to be “ACREDITED” by TATOC.

 

Somehow I don’t think this is actually in the interests of you the owners / members. I agree that the owners committees should have good relations with the resort developer, but this should be on an equal partnership. After all it is your money that is paying for it and keeping the resorts open and maintained.

 

It certainly seems that it is time for new organisations and associations to be set up to serve your interests, as well as a new and non industry related body to oversee the developers and resorts. So get rid of TATOC and The RDO, then you may at last have some say as well as justice.

 

If you have any questions or thoughts on this subject Inside Timeshare would be pleased to hear from you. If you want any information regarding any timeshare matter we will try to answer it, if we don´t know we will find it out.

 

Here We Go Again! Another Supreme Court Ruling for CLA against Anfi.

Canarian Legal Alliance once again announces another Supreme Court victory against Anfi, this was published on their website on 31 May 2016.

 

The Supreme Court again has awarded one of their clients double the deposit back, due to the fact of taking payments within the 14 day cooling off period. The court has also reinforced the fact that floating weeks and contracts in perpetuity are illegal. This client will be receiving over 30,000€ and have their contract canceled.

 

This now brings the number of rulings by the Supreme Court on behalf of CLA clients to nine. This will obviously have a profound effect on all timeshares sold within Spanish jurisdiction, the floodgates have been opened and there is now no turning back.

 

Consumers now have the full protection of the law despite what the timeshare companies and the trade body the RDO may say. In the end it is only themselves to blame for their present predicament.

 

It has also come to the attention of Inside Timeshare that another case brought in Tenerife against Silverpoint has resulted in a victory. The only information so far is the case was conducted on behalf of a British Silverpoint client, the case was heard by Judge José Pablo Carrera Fernadez. At present we do not know which firm started these proceedings. It would seem that the court in Tenerife has also used the Supreme Court rulings in its judgement. More will be published on this when the information becomes available.

 

Once again congratulations to the respective clients and both the legal teams that fought your cases.

slicksaleman

THE SUPREME COURT STRIKES AGAIN

Inside Timeshare is here to bring you the latest news and information about the world of timeshare. If you need any advise or information about your own timeshare or any company that you may be thinking of dealing with, contact Inside Timeshare for free and impartial advice.

Breaking News: Canarian Legal Alliance Strike Again.

Some interesting breaking news has just come our way, it appears that Canarian Legal  Alliance has done it again. It has been announced that they have secured their eighth Supreme Court Judgement, again this is against Anfi Sales SL and Anfi Resorts SL. (see link at end of article)

anfi ariel view

The court has confirmed again the illegality of the perpetuity contract, citing that the contract should be no longer than 50 years in accordance with the timeshare laws. The court has also ruled on another important point which will have a significant effect for other claimants.

 

As we know many people will have bought a timeshare with other resorts while already owning at another. These have usually been taken in part exchange or what is known as a trade-in. The court has now ruled that the trade-in value must now be taken into account as a payment on the day along with any deposit. The client in this instance was awarded double the deposit including double the value of the trade-in. So it looks like the trade-in value is being seen as a part payment within the 14 day cooling off period.

 

In this instance the CLA client has been awarded 51,000€ plus interest, including all legal fees. Again this is a substantial amount for any company to have to pay back for past transgressions, how long can any company last when the courts are ruling in this manner?

anfi logordo-logo

As stated before, the industry has only itself to blame, the RDO as the industry trade body also shares some of this blame. After all, the laws were put into place many years ago with the implementation of the EU Timeshare Directive. Resorts and their marketing departments failed to adhere to them and the RDO turned a blind eye to this. The industry is now paying for this dearly, we have seen only a fraction of the cases adjudicated on so far. Over the past month and a half, one company has been ordered to pay out nearly half a million euros. At this rate the million euro mark will be reached before the year is even half way through.

 

So, congratulations to this particular client and congratulations to the legal team at Canarian Legal Alliance. It does seem that their tenacity and hard work is now paying off, I for one will be keeping an eye on them for more judgements.

champagne

If you have any problem with your timeshare or have dealt with any company that has not delivered on their promise be it resale or claims, Inside Timeshare would like to hear from you. If you require any information as to what you can do about it, Inside Timeshare will be pleased to advise you.

THE SUPREME COURT RULES AGAIN