Browse Category

Consumer advice

Thursday Updates

In Yesterday’s article on RSB Legal based in Redditch Worcestershire, looking like they have ceased trading, Inside Timeshare was contacted by Praetorian Legal, with the following information which we publish for our readers.

They have advised us that Praetorian Legal had been contacted by RSB Legal in order to underwrite some of their termination business.

Their statement is, if you received a Praetorian Legal indemnity document, they have advised us that Praetorian Legal will honour their indemnity and timeshare owners will remain fully covered under the Praetorian Legal Timeshare Protection Indemnity.

Inside Timeshare would like to thank Gary Smith of Praetorian Legal for responding so quickly, this does show their are some companies who are willing to do the right thing. It also shows that what has been published about his company by TESS and the TCA is designed to sully his reputation.

On the subject of TESS, the website TESS Timeshare Facts has been rather busy with their research, in their article:

DAVID COX AND BERNADETTE COX DISSOLVE COMPANIES FASTER THAN ALKA SELTZER IN A GLASS OF WATER

In this article they have uncovered some very interesting information, this surrounds David Cox’s past “business career”, it does not look very impressive. It highlights every business that Mr Cox has been involved with, showing the status of the business, many are dissolved with unpaid debts!

These are just of the few that have been published on the TESS Timeshare Facts website:

Directors of U JET LIMITED were David Cox & Bernadette Cox  Status: Dissolved Unpaid debts left owing

Directors of D & B COX LIMITED were David Cox & Bernadette Cox  Status Dissolved Unpaid debts left owing

Directors of D & B COX (CONTRACTING) LIMITED are David Cox and Mrs Bernadette Cox.  Trading Status: Dissolved Unpaid Debts left owing

For the full article click on the link below:

https://tesstimesharefacts.com/news/david-cox-bernadette-cox-disolve-companies-faster-alker-seltza-glass-water/

The article also provides all the links to company house records as well as links to other websites, Inside Timeshare would love to meet the authors of this website, but we fully understand the reason for them wanting to remain anonymous. All Inside Timeshare can say is keep up the research!

Just to finish off today, it was also announced by Canarian Legal Alliance that they have received another ruling from the Supreme Court in Madrid, this now makes 106.

This case involving clients from Norway was against Palm Oasis / Tasolan SL, the lawyer representing them was Miguel Rodriguez Ceballos, CLA’s senior lawyer. The interesting fact about this particular case is the Escritura and the registration of the timeshare at the Property Registry. By registering they were trying to treat the timeshare as property thereby attempting to circumvent the timeshare laws, making then non-applicable. The court disagreed and declared that timeshare law was applicable.

The court declared the contract null and void awarding the return of over 16,000€. One of the infractions of the timeshare law was the length of the contract, being more than 50 years. (PDF of the court ruling is below).

Supreme Court Palm Oasis Tasolan

In tomorrow’s Letter from America we shall be running the story of Gad and Noreen Liebmann, both army veterans and their experiences at the hands of Diamond sales agents. They are currently staging a protest outside Diamond’s Daytona Beach Resort. So do join us tomorrow, it is a story that will make your blood boil!

Inside Timeshare is here to inform you of what is happening in the murky world of timeshare, bringing you the news from the courts, the US and beyond bringing timeshare owners around the world together. We also publish articles about different companies and how they operate, inform you of the fake law firms and what to look out for,so you have the facts who to trust.

If you are unsure about any company that contacts you or one that you have found searching on the web, contact Inside Timeshare and we will help you find out.

Claims and Relinquishments: Who Can You Trust?

Just recently Inside Timeshare has been receiving many enquiries regarding RSB Legal, mostly Club la Costa members, they have all been the same, “have they gone out of business as we cannot contact them”?

Well the short answer is probably yes, according to Company House records under Company Status, there is an “Active proposal to strike off”, which means they are about to be liquidated. They are also overdue on this years accounts, which have not yet been submitted. (See PDF below)

RSB LEGAL LTD

What were RSB Legal doing?

The “service” they were offering was cancellation of timeshare contracts and compensation claims on a no win no fee basis, sounds good does it not?

Only problem is that to make the claim the client must pay thousands to cancel the contract first, once the client is out of the timeshare they would then do a claim. Only one problem here, how is the claim to be made?

As most of the timeshares were purchased in Spain, then Spanish Timeshare Law applies, this is where the problem lies. Once the timeshare has been cancelled, it is not possible to take the claim through a Spanish Court, there is no contract in existence, therefore no claim.

So this leaves us with only one alternative, a Section 75 under the Credit Consumer Act 1974. But this only covers the following:

Goods and services not received, the company has gone into liquidation, (therefore you will not receive the goods or services), faulty goods or goods not fit for purpose.

https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/shopping/section75-protect-your-purchases

Now considering that many have used their timeshares, the timeshare company will argue with your credit card provider that you have used the goods and services, after all you have booked holidays!

Section 75 does not cover a timeshare for contravening Spanish Timeshare Law, for instance, the illegal taking of deposits or full payment within the 14 day cooling off period, contracts with a duration of more than 50 years or floating weeks and points systems.

The only way to claim for these breaches and have the contract declared null and void, that is different to being cancelled, is through litigation in a Spanish Court. Also not all contracts will be claimable, there are cases which will not be accepted either by a reputable law firm or the courts.

Now for the relinquishment, our readers have also told us that their cancellations have been passed to another firm called Taylor Marshall Associates, again the story is the same. They are told not to pay anymore maintenance fees, then after some time the client receives a letter stating that their contract has been terminated. Unfortunately they find out from Club la Costa that it has not. Below is an extract from Club la Costa’s email to clients:

“Since February 2016 CLC World (‘CLC’) has been receiving identical ‘copy’ correspondence, from companies called ‘Taylor Marshall’ and ‘RSB Legal’ in respect of some of our Members. Regardless of the holiday product held by the Member or their membership history, the only change to each letter is the name of the Member on the top of the correspondence.

Furthermore, the correspondence was initially near identical to those received from other claims companies against whom the UK authorities are now taking legal action.

Over the last 2 years, CLC has consistently advised Taylor Marshall and their associated company RSB Legal that we will NOT accept their correspondence as correct notification to “TERMINATE” any CLC World membership. CLC World has an established free of charge exit strategy in place for all CLC Members and we do NOT accept Surrender or Relinquishment notices from third party claims companies. Despite this, Taylor Marshall (RSB Legal) continue to falsely claim that they are successful in somehow ‘forcing’ CLC World to release members from their contracts. This is simply untrue.

CLC will only complete a Surrender Request when processed direct with the CLC Member.

We have seen Taylor Marshall’s so called ‘Contracts’ that state that Members should not speak with CLC World or they will face financial penalties. We understand that this, unnecessarily worries many of you, and if this is the case, may we respectfully suggest to you that you contact either the CLC World MS Legal team OR one of the well-established organisations we refer to below for advice.

Unfortunately, there are many ‘Third Party Claims’ companies who encourage people to ‘sign-up’ with them by making false claims about their membership. Many of these companies are linked to each other and we are glad to report that more and more the UK Authorities are taking positive enforcement action on behalf of individuals who have become involved with these companies”.

Why would Taylor Marshall’s contract state that members should not contact CLC World or face financial penalties?

Could it be they don’t want you to find out that your contract has not been cancelled?

Are they that nieve that you will not find out, after all you will end up getting demands for maintenance fees?

CLC are not the only company that hold this position, many more are taking the same line, Diamond have a policy in place, one is exceptional circumstances which cover those over 75, death of a partner, financial hardship and medical. If the member does not fall into this then they have the possibility of relinquishing on payment of 2 years maintenance.

We now have another problem, as the work has not been done is there a chance of getting the money back under section 75?

If this was paid partially or in full on a credit card there is a possibility, the problem is that RSB Legal will claim as they do not actually do the relinquishments but contract them out to a third party, Taylor Marshall, they have fulfilled their contractual obligations. After all the claim is no win no fee!

Now that RSB Legal cannot be contacted and there is a proposal to strike off, the possibility of claiming may come under “the company is no longer trading”, so a claim may be possible.

Whether they are UK based or Spanish based companies, there are many more who use the same method of extracting your money, the only safe option is to do your homework before paying any money. If you do pay never do so by any other means than a credit card, that way at least you may just be able to get the money back.

If you have any questions or concerns about any company that has contacted you with a similar “pitch”, contact Inside Timeshare and we will be pleased to help and point you in the right direction.

check list

The Tuesday Slot with Irene

This week’s Tuesday Slot is not from Inside Timeshares very own Irene Parker, but has been contributed by Meryl Reyman another new contributor, today she highlights the problems in Nevada.

First we have a look at the timeshare world in Europe and the latest court cases.

Last week we published the news of the 100th Supreme Court ruling then the 102nd and 103rd, after publication we received the news of yet two more rulings from Spain’s highest court, bringing the total now to 105

The first is another ruling against Silverpoint in Tenerife, the main points are the illegal taking of deposits and the contract being over 50 years in duration, the sentence which can be seen in the PDF below runs to 15 pages and shows even more infractions of various laws not just timeshare law 42/98.

1st N4 Silverpoint data protected (tay)

The court declared these clients contract null and void, awarding over 34,000€ plus legal interest.

The second Supreme court ruling is yet another against Anfi, at the moment we do not have details on what the infractions were, but the court again declared the contract null and void with the return of over 78,000€ plus legal interest.

These rulings from the Supreme Court are the proof the timeshare companies are losing, despite what they and others may be telling the public.

Going back to the articles regarding the David Cox and TESS allegations against Inside Timeshare and Canarian Legal Alliance, the TESS website and Mr Cox have been very quiet. In fact nothing has been published since 22 March, well, we wonder if Mr Cox can’t think of what to write, after all his ramblings clearly show he is not sound of mind. We leave you the reader to decide on that one.

http://insidetimeshare.com/david-cox-tess-attacking-sundry/

http://insidetimeshare.com/tess-allegations-facts/

Now for our Tuesday Slot by Meryl.

Timeshare Companies, Preying on the Young, the Elderly and Military Personnel, are under your Noses Here in Nevada

section 5

By Meryl Reyman

A retired attorney and former senior executive of a large marketing/advertising agency located in New York City. I am now a resident of Henderson, NV.

A Nevada Timeshare “Buyer Beware” Media Campaign

April 17, 2018

During a recent stay in Las Vegas my husband and I attended a hard sell timeshare sales presentation. After 5+ hours of promises, and a 15 minute perfunctory signing of extensive opaque written documents, we went home with a contract only to discover that very little of what was said over those five hours was in the written documents. We successfully rescinded the contract. Since timeshare sales agents rely on the vacationer not taking the time to review documents, we were lucky that we lived in the area and had time to catch the concealment.  

The FBI defines fraud for profit as “deceit, concealment, violation of trust, and bait and switch.” Oral misrepresentation fits the bill. And so does deceit and concealment if new purchasers cannot access the booking website until after the expiration of the rescission period. Many complainants tell us they can’t determine the value of their purchase until they’ve passed the time period to cancel.

Given the perpetual nature of the timeshare contract, the lack of a viable secondary market, and rising maintenance fees, consumers can find themselves stuck in a hamster wheel of “recycled inventory” with points foreclosed or taken back, only to be sold again to the next unsuspecting vacationer.

Of course there are many who use and enjoy their vacation points. I’m sure there are timeshare sales agents selling the product honestly, but the escalations in timeshare company default rates, lawsuits and the number of Attorneys General investigations (TN, MO, AZ, CO, NY, WI) indicate a serious problem. Are we in timeshare haven Nevada going to allow deceit to continue by dismissing families with, “you have no proof”?  

I hope not. If you are in agreement, we need your help.

We are launching this media campaign to alert and educate the timeshare consumer, because the Court of Public Opinion seems to be the only court open if you bought timeshare points in Nevada.  

After our experience I started digging. I learned that timeshare deceit has been ongoing since before Social Media. I have decided to use my skills to advocate for timeshare reform. This is not a one company problem.  In my opinion, and it is the opinion of 44 timeshare advocates from our Timeshare Advocacy Group™, timeshare, and especially the point-based timeshare system, has evolved to encourage and allow sleight of hand, predatory sales.

Timeshare Advocacy Group TAG has had a hard time keeping up with the flood of complaints. TAG has received 136 timeshare complaints just since January 1, 2018. Most of these complainants have reached out to the Nevada Attorney General and the Nevada Real Estate Division, where the timeshare companies and their agents are licensed to do business, to no avail.

Timeshare sales agents know they are protected by their corporate goliath. One vice president endorsed this by responding to one member, “Our Company is not responsible for what our sales agents say.” In actuality, there is proof, if the Nevada authorities would simply aggregate the complaints. They would then see the weight of allegations of deceitful sales practices that, because of their similarity, appear to be orchestrated from the top down.

Some of these predatory practices include:

  • Delaying delivery of important information so that the legal contract rescission period is undermined. Several complainants could not get onto the website until after close of escrow to determine the number of points actually needed to go to their desired destinations.  
  • Luring customers to “owner updates” and “new customer orientations” that are really hard upsell opportunities,
  • Instilling fear by falsely advising that current fees of existing owners will go up astronomically unless they purchase “new program” points,
  • Instilling fear by falsely advising that heirs of the elderly will be saddled with astronomic fees unless they purchase “new program” points,           
  • Holding onto customer ID and credit cards, and their children! One member reported hearing children screaming while customers sat through hours of hard sell,
  • Feeling pressured into high interest rate loans (12% to 18%) and higher interest rate credit cards.
  • Claiming that timeshare points will increase in value over time!! In fact, a class action lawsuit has been filed to fight this “investment” claim. For many timeshare points, there is little to no resale value.

We have a summary report of more than 50 families who have filed complaints against a Nevada sales center. This report is available upon request. Two of the complainants are:

  • Roy and Lillian Simmons, in fear of losing their home, up-sold to $2,700 a month in timeshare loan payments, living on Roy’s letter carrier pension.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_nca6lMA4U&feature=youtu.b

  • Raymond Mori, recipient of two Purple Hearts, 23 years a Marine, at age 83, in a wheelchair, told to buy an additional $234,000 in additional timeshare points. Teresa is sure her parents would have signed if she had not been with them.

Do not believe anything a timeshare sales agent says in Nevada. If you do intend to do business with a timeshare sales agent, make sure they put promises in writing.  

For more information, please contact me at: [email protected] or Timeshare Advocacy Group: https://www.facebook.com/timeshareadvocategroup/

Thank you to Meryl for her advocacy efforts. If you or someone you know needs help with a timeshare concern contact one of these self-help groups that Inside Timeshare feels is not industry influenced.

https://www.facebook.com/timeshareadvocategroup/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/DiamondResortsOwnersAdvocacy/

https://tug2.com/Home.aspx

https://www.facebook.com/groups/180578055325962/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/465692163568779/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1639958046252175/

advocate 1

Thank you Meryl for your contribution and also Irene for the editing, we also once again thank all the volunteers who give their time effortlessly to help other timeshare users in trouble.

In this Friday’s Letter From America we will be highlighting the story of Gad and Noreen Liebmann, who are currently staging a protest outside Diamonds Daytona Beach Resort. We are through Inside Timeshare readers and those on the various facebook pages receiving many messages of encouragement and support for both of you. We will obviously be keeping our readers posted as the story unfolds.

If you have any questions, comments about any article published, or need any help in identifying any company that has contacted you, use our contact page and ask Inside Timeshare. We are here to help and point you in the right direction.

stop press 1

News has just come in from the Bournemouth Daily Echo, the trial against Francis Madden, Claire Garland, Keith Furneval and Jean Furnaval, regarding a timeshare fraud which ran for several years has started.

Their company Central Marketing Ltd, defrauded thousands of pounds in selling bogus holiday clubs and other products. The trial is expected to last at least six weeks, for the full story see link below.

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/16164465.Four_face_trial_on_timeshare_fraud_charges/

Centaurus Mediations & the Silverpoint Connection

Centaurus Mediations SL, CIF: B76750868  C/ Santa Rosa 1- Edificio Royal Palm, Local 3, Arona 38640, Tenerife, is not a new company to our pages, we first highlighted them back in January. The named company Administrator is one Caroline Hibbery who is also the administrator for several other companies, not unusual as these types of enterprises tend to use a front name to protect the actual persons behind them.

The in February it became apparent that Centaurus Mediations SL is one of the companies set up by Mark Cushway and Silverpoint. It was around the time that Silverpoint closed all of their sales decks and staff lost their “jobs”. (Well not all of them, obviously they would be needed in the new enterprises).

Centaurus began contacting Silverpoint members, the difference being from other companies that also cold call is they knew all the details of the clients membership, even down to the fact that they had taken legal action and won!

Centaurus Logo

So what are Centaurus telling these clients?

During the call the agent James, another name that has come up is Alan, tells the clients that even though Silverpoint have lost the cases at court, no one will get paid out. The only way to cancel the contract and get anything back is to go with Centaurus.

So Silverpoint, who sold the illegal contracts in the first place is now contacting their own clients, albeit under the guise of a new name, to help them get out of their timeshare!

Inside Timeshare has been contacted by many readers after these calls, many have even stated that they have cases waiting to be heard at court. Now we do know from experience that members data is often kept by sales staff as an insurance policy in the event of redundancy, but that usually only contains names and telephone numbers. The type of information these readers are being told is basically their entire purchase history.

This only leads to one conclusion, they are using the SILVERPOINT MEMBERS DATABASE!

The email these readers have received after the initial call is signed by James:

Further to our conversation, I am pleased to provide you with an insight into the professional services provided by us at Centaurus Mediations. I’m sure you are aware of the turmoil that has existed over the last few years regarding the timeshare product, its legality and sales tactics adopted by ruthless timeshare sales people. You are also probably aware that recent Supreme Court rulings have turned the tide in favour of the timeshare member.

As I have discussed with you, we here at Centaurus provide solutions for the numerous and varied concerns of the average timeshare member, whether they be concerns over the legality, effectiveness or longevity of your contract or the minefield that exists when solutions to those issues are sought from third parties.

As mediators our roles are to extract you from your commitment with your Timeshare company and introduce you to our recommended registered law firm if necessary. Our services range from extraction from complicated and binding timeshare agreements to the investigation into possible financial compensation on your behalf. Our services are all of a new win no fee nature and in some cases have guaranteed time frames. Should the services of our recommended law firm be required, a no win no fee service is also offered by the firm.

Mediation. In our role as mediators we aim to provide best advice with the sole intention of resolving disputes between our clients and their resort or holiday club.

Kind Regards

James

Centaurus Mediations SL

Registration Nº: B76750868

www.centaurusmediations.com

[email protected]

It would be interesting to see what these services under their “New no win no fee nature”, along with what guaranteed time frames?

It also seems strange that the “recommended law firm offers a no win no fee service”!

Another name that has suddenly cropped up with regards to Centaurus is one Lee Burton, apparently he is well known in timeshare circles, mainly as a bit of a henchman. He is closely associated with Mark Cushway, as well as others in the industry.

Lee Burton

Inside Timeshare has also been informed that this individual is also under investigation for lying to the court under oath, which is known as perjury. A Criminal Denuncia (official police complaint) has also been filed against him on this very matter.

It is believed from our sources that his role is ensure the smooth running of the operation and dealing with any “problems”. Judging by his reputation, a role he is well suited for.

If you have been contacted or taken up the services of this company and no feel that you may be subject to being “defrauded”, then contact Inside Timeshare and we will pass you to a lawyer for free legal advice.

Inside Timeshare would also like to hear from you about any company that contacts you regarding your timeshare, especially if it is with Silverpoint, use our contact page and we will point you in the right direction.

 

More Photographs Identified

This week Inside Timeshare has been highlighting the “Fake Law Firms” which are part of the Litigious Abogados Family, today we publish more identities of the genuine people whose images have been used.

amador-ganeca-logo

We start with Amador Ganeca Abogados, when you enter the website the first photo you see is of the “founder” called Amador Ganeca, this gentleman is in fact the founder of Yáñez & Asociados Abogados, Álvaro Yáñez.

This law firm is based in Bogotá, Columbia, it has been in existence for 35 years.

amador-ganeca-fw

http://www.yanezabogados.com/en/firm/

There are another four “lawyers” pictured, so far only one has not been identified, the first is known as Simone Maengas Arlovaz, very similar to the name used for the image of Joshua Valentine in yesterday’s article, Simono Maenga Arlovas, from Amador Galeca Abogados.

The actual person is Alejandro Aparicio Ferrer, of the Valencia based firm Aparicio Consulting Juridico – Económico.

simone-maengas-arlovaz-wm

We then have Balthazar Hermid Nisbemas, again a very similar name Balthather Hirmod Nisbelam, from the same Amador Galeca website identified as the Australian lawyer Steve Cardell.

The actual person is Diego Muñoz one of the founding partners in the Muñoz Tamayo & Asociados, from Bogotá, Columbia. He is also President of the Colombian Legal Services Chamber of the ANDI Association, so another very eminent person whose image has been used illegally.

balthazar-hermid-nisbemas-wm

The last one from this “fake firm” is Domingo Varlotes Biriendel, whose is actually  Dr. Augusto Arbaiza Perito Grafotécnico Abogado – Criminalista, a distinguished lawyer in Peru’s Capital Lima. The original photograph was probably lifted from the website below.

domingo-varlotes-biriendel-wm

http://www.arbaizaabogados.com/

We now move to Amador Gareca Abogados, this website is no longer accessible, which is not surprising as we did highlight this “firm” in June 2017.

http://insidetimeshare.com/litigipus-abogados-family-gets-bigger/

The image and name used for the founder of this “firm” is Armando Garcia, none other than the above named Álvaro Yáñez, of Amador Ganeca Abogados.

The next image is named as Agustin Bigote Pringata, it is in fact the Azerbijan Ambassador to Argentina Rashad Aslanov, the photo is actually doctored from the official photo of him presenting his credentials to the Argentinian President Mauricio Macri.

armando-gareca-abogados-agustin-bigote-pringata  Argentina President

https://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/politics/2735370.html

Once again the same image used on the Amador Ganeca website for Simone Maengas Arlovaz, is named here as Domingo Barlotes Miriendel, who is Alejandro Aparicio Ferrer, of the Valencia based firm Aparicio Consulting Juridico – Económico.

http://aparicioconsulting.es/en/equipo/alejandro-aparicio-ferrer

The last is named as Juan Firmid Mantadiz, but again the same image is used on the Amador Ganeca website, using the alias Balthazar Hermid Nisbemas, it is once again Diego Muñoz.

As you can see, the creators of these “fake firms” have been very creative with choice of names and the careful use of images, using ones which look distinguished and trustworthy. Obviously a lot of effort went into searching for the images, but this really does go to show how you cannot trust everything you see on the internet.

If you have been contacted by any company or are thinking of taking on any services regarding your timeshare, contact Inside Timeshare, we will be happy to point you in the right direction in finding the genuine firms from the “fake”.

 

Fake Law Firms Using Real Lawyers Photographs

Following on from our previous articles regarding the “fake law firms” we today highlight two more and identify the actual persons whose images have been used.

The first is, Abogados Canarias which is part of the Litigious Abogados family, we have now found new identities from the photographs they have used on their website as their lawyers.

abogados-canarias-logo

http://abogados-canarias.com/civil-law/

The first is the so-called founder of the company Manuel Cilavoz Varintos, who is in actual fact Carlos Magnanini the Global Account Manager for the Argentinian company Clarke Modet & Co Argentina SA.

abogados-canarias-manuel-cilavoz-varintos-300x300

https://www.clarkemodet.com/en/experts/carlos-magnanini.html

Another photograph on the website named as Fernando Siltal Crostena is actually another Argentinian, Doctor Jaime Leonardo Kleidermacher of A. Kleidermacher Abogados & Consultores. He graduated from the University of Buenos Aires in 1986.

abogados-canarias-fernando-siltal-crostena

http://www.kleidermacher.com/integrantes.html

The photograph of Juan Cretedos Dolabaris has not been fully identified, but it is believed to be an Italian lawyer called Pasquale Frisina Roma. The search for this one continues.

The third lawyer pictured Manolo Derban Ferolita has so far not been found on any searches.

Another of the “fake” law firms is Amador Galeca Abogados, which we highlighted in September 2017.

amador-galeca-300x191

http://amadorgaleca.com/civil-law/

The so-called founder of this company is named as Amador Malodan Galeca, he is in fact Emilio J. Zegrí Boada, from the Spanish law firm Zegri + Olivar, based at Avenida Diagonal, 606, Principal 1ª 08021 Barcelona.

amador-malodan-galeca-243x300

http://www.abogadospenalistas.es/abogados/

Another lawyer whose image is being used is named as Simono Maenga Arlovas, he is in fact a young but distinguished lawyer named Joshua R. Valentine, from the law firm Caulder & Valentine based at 1157 E Marion St Suite 4 Shelby, NC 28150. tel:704.470.2440 .704.754.8401 (fax).

simono-maenga-arlovas

According to his profile on the firms website he is a very highly educated young lawyer:

https://www.cauldervalentine.com/josh-valentine

Education:

  • Charlotte School of Law
  • J.D., Magna Cum Laude
  • Associate Editor of Charlotte School of Law Law Review
  • Certification and Concentration in Employment Law
  • Phi Delta Phi International Legal Honor Society
  • Order of the Crown
  • Pro Bono Honors
  • CALI Awards (Highest Grade)—Lawyering Process and Contracts
  • Full Scholarship
  • Gardner-Webb University
  • B.S. in Accounting, Summa Cum Laude
  • Distinguished Senior Student Award – Highest GPA
  • Alpha Sigma Lambda National Honorary Society

Bar Admissions:

  • North Carolina State Bar
  • South Carolina State Bar
  • United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina

We now have two lawyers from the Amador Galeca website from the same law firm, Clarke Kann Lawyers from Australia, this firm has two offices based at Level 7, 300 Queen Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Australia and Level 4, 9 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia.

On the “fake” website they are named as Manuel Pralge Namblib who is actually Joseph Najem a Consultant based at their Sydney office:

manuel-pralge-namblib-300x300

http://www.clarkekann.com.au/people/joseph-najem

Then there is Balthathar Hirmod Nisbelam, who in fact is Steven Cardell, a Partner in the firm and based in Brisbane.

balthathar-hirmod-nisbelam-300x300

http://www.clarkekann.com.au/people

So there we have it, not only are these “fake” firms forging official documents, using official logos illegally but also using photographs of genuine lawyers without their knowledge, although they will know by the end of today.

Inside Timeshare is here to help you get to the truth, if you have had any contact from any of the companies named in these articles use our contact page and let us know. Remember these are not genuine law firms, they exist only to take your hard earned money from you.

 

The Tuesday Slot from Canada

Today’s article from Canada by Patrick Cormier is about Intrawest sales practices to Club Intrawest members.  The complaint in the lawsuit concerns the immediate and extreme devaluation of points after purchase from the developer, providing little to no resale value. Diamond Resorts acquired Intrawest Resorts in 2015 and continues the practices leading to this devaluation.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20160129005913/en/Diamond-Resorts-International-Completes-Acquisition-Intrawest-Resort

Diamond Resort members in the US have learned their points are virtually worthless on resale. Many Inside Timeshare readers tell us they have been told points would be easy to resell and points will increase in value. In response to one of our reader complaints, a Diamond Vice President’s response was, “We’re not responsible for anything our sales agents say.”

This is the very reason Inside Timeshare is so important and why every timeshare member needs to be an advocate, reaching out to the general public to warn the general public that timeshares official position in several companies seems to be, “We’re not responsible for anything a sales agent says.” This is indeed a green light to lie. With little to no enforcement of timeshare regulation, timeshare sales and marketing fraud continues unchecked.

https://www.citheownersgroup.org/

Following on from yesterday’s article where we identified the genuine lawyers from their photographs used by the “FAKE” Legalidades Abogados, we have now identified another three from the previous “FAKE LAW FIRM” Manuel Hidualdo Abogados article published in March, both of these are from the Litigious Abogados family of “Fake firms”.

http://insidetimeshare.com/thursday-roundup/

manuel selando hidualdo

The first is the “founder” of the firm, Manuel Selando Hidualdo, the actual person is:

Miguel Ángel Pardo Falcón

Graduado Social Diplomado (1988/1990).

Colegiado nº 924 por el C.O.G.S.S. dese 1993.

Of Bolonia Abogados based at the following address:

Avenida San Francisco Javier, 24, 9ª, 12 – Edificio Sevilla I – 41018 Sevilla

https://boloniaabogados.com/quienes-somos-en-bolonia-abogados/

francisco fralja sobanem

The second one named as Francisco Fralja Sobanem on the “fake” website is in fact a Mexican lawyer called Angel Prieto, who owns his own law practice on the Yucatan Peninsula

Av. Sunyaxchen lotes 56 y 57

Sm 24, Mz 28

Edificio Siglo XXI oficina 209

Cancún, QR

México 77509

+52 (998) 251-7010

http://www.angelprieto.com/attorneys.html

emilio derlanta cantelar

Our third identification is named as Emilio Derlanta Cantelar, but is actually a US Lawyer named David J. Winer, from the law firm Winer & Winer, based at:

Law Offices of Winer & Winer

9 N County St. #100

Waukegan, IL 60085

Tel: (847) 336-9111

Fax: (847) 336-4182

http://winerlawoffice.com/attorneys/david-winer/

Obviously these gentlemen have no idea that their images are being used for fraudulent purposes, well they will do now!

We shall be keeping an eye open for the next incarnation that they come up with, we will also identify any other photo of their so called lawyers with the genuine person.

Now on with our Tuesday article from Canada.

quebec

Quebec Superior Court Authorizes Class Action against Intrawest

Intrawest ULC owns, operates, and manages mountain and beach destination resorts in North America and Europe. The company also manages heli-skiing operations, and golf and beach resort clubs. In additions, it provides resort real estate sales and marketing services for various destinations; rental management services at various resort locations; and vacation reservation services with information on accommodations, air and ground transportation, destination, virtual tours, vacation guides, activities, entertainment, and places to dine. Further, Intrawest ULC engages in real estate development operations. Intrawest ULC was incorporated in 1979 and is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=361001

April 10, 2018

PATRICK CORMIER·TUESDAY, MARCH 20, 2018

https://www.citheownersgroup.org/class-action

On March 20th, 2018, the Superior Court of Quebec released a decision by Hon. Anne Jacob certifying a class action to proceed against Intrawest ULC. The full text of the decision is available here (available in French only). What follows is a summary of key information.

What has been authorized by the court? A lawsuit in reduction of price paid to Intrawest UCL, compensatory damages and punitive damages in relation to alleged illicit sales practice in relation to becoming a Club Intrawest member and to fees that were allegedly not disclosed at the time of purchase.

Who are the potential class members?

Potential class members are individuals that have purchased points directly from Intrawest in Quebec, with the exception of such individuals having sold their points before 2007. So, if you purchased your points from the developer in Quebec and have not sold those points before 2007, you currently stand to be eligible.

What does it mean for a class to be certified? It means that Martin Robichaud will be allowed to proceed in his suit against Intrawest as a representative of a larger class of individuals. Should he be successful, it means that the remedy obtained by him will also be available to similarly eligible class members. By certifying this class action, it means the court believed the four following conditions were met:

  1. The factual context of members is identical, similar or connected.
  2. Allegations appear to justify the remedy sought.
  3. The composition of the class would not make it practical for individual members to individually or jointly sue the defendant.
  4. The representative member (Mr Robichaud in this case) can ensure adequate representation of other members.

What are the facts underpinning this case?

Mr Robichaud’s case is in relation to the purchase of 160 points for a total price of Cdn$30,560 in 2009. At the time, Mr Robichaud (like so many of us) believed, according to the explanations offered at the time of sale, that should he wish to re-sell at a later time, he would essentially recoup his investment. There was also the purchase of 300 additional points on the secondary market also in 2009.

In 2014, five years after the initial purchase, he asked about the repurchase program. He was also informed at that time about the need to sell his points to another member with a minimal price per point failing which there would be no Extraordinary Escape (EE) privileges attached to the points sold.

The circumstances under which Mr Robichaud attempted to sell his points or have the points repurchased led him to believe the 160 points he originally purchased had been severally devalued because of undisclosed facts at the time of purchase and subsequent decisions and actions by Intrawest ULC.

What are the issues raised in this class action?

Mr Robichaud is asking the court to answer many important questions, including:

  • Has Intrawest used prohibited sales practices? Should this be the case, should Intrawest be reimbursing members or should members be entitled to a reduction in the price paid?
  • Should members be entitled to punitive damages because of their alleged breach of the Consumer Protection Act (Québec)?
  • Should members be dispensed from paying annual fees because they do not own the properties?

What is the remedy sought by this class action?

Mr Robichaud believes the points have been devalued by approx 75% because several keys facts were not disclosed to him in accordance with the Consumer Protection Act of Quebec. He also believes he should not have paid the annual fees. He therefore asks the court:

  • A 75% refund of the price paid in relation to the original purchase of 160 points from Intrawest ULC;
  • 100% of the annual fees paid to date for all points;
  • Punitive damages ($5,000).

What are the next steps of this class action?

There are a few additional minor procedural steps before the case fully proceeds. The Volunteers Coordinating Committee (VCC) will keep the Club Intrawest Owners Group (CIOG) posted as details are known to us. We have a good relationship with Mr Robichaud and are already supporting him, for example, by sharing aggregate member survey information.

What are the next steps of the VCC?

We welcome this highly sought after decision as a key milestone that will significantly influence and inform the refinement of our legal strategy. Broadly speaking, the major areas of further analysis are:

  • Assuming the case of Mr Robichaud succeeds, how could the remedy be extended to purchases of points outside of Quebec?
  • Develop a fully informed legal analysis, taking into account the Robichaud class action and its repercussions, and table options to the membership in the form of proposals at a first AGM of the future Embarc Owners Association, a new association in the process of being created by the VCC.

Stay vacationed, but stay aware!

Patrick Cormier, B.Sc., B.C.L./LL.B., CD VCC Team Leader

Related articles:  Club Intrawest v. CanadaMust Pay Millions in GST Back Taxes

Club Intrawest (Embarc)Timeshare

http://insidetimeshare.com/fridays-letter-canada/

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20151125005060/en/Diamond-Resorts-International-Acquire-Intrawest-Resort-Club

Thank you Patrick for your contribution, this does show that timeshare owners / members the world over are being subjected to some very dubious practices, we are all in this together, it is only through articles such as this will we ever see any change.

If you have any questions or comments about this or any article published, contact Inside Timeshare through our contact page.

For those readers in Europe, if you have been contacted by a law firm from Tenerife that tells you your timeshare resort / company is being taken to court and you can be in on the action, please do let us know, especially if it sounds like one of those we have been highlighting.

It is through your information that we can research and report as to the legitimacy of these companies, warning others to beware. Remember to do your homework, it will save you in the end.

homework1

Lagalidades Abogados: Update on Fake Lawyers Names

In last Friday’s Letter from America, we began with another new name in the family of “fake” law firms that started with Litigious Abogados, this one is called Legalidades Abogados.

Friday’s Letter from America

legalidades-abogados-logo

Civil Law

 

Over the weekend one of our regular readers informed Inside Timeshare that one of the photographs of the new lawyers was familiar to him, he also provided a name. On investigating the name provided it turns out the pictured lawyer is one:

Dr DR. ABELARDO ENCINAS SILVA, an eminent lawyer in Peru on Constitutional law, sitting on the CÁTEDRA DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL GENERAL, (CHAIR OF GENERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW).

pablo-Ibernas-cavosa-legalidades-abogados-300x201
Photo from the Legalidades Website
Dr Abelardo Encinas Silva
The Genuine Dr Abelardo Encinas Silva

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below are a couple of links showing Dr Abelardo:

http://drencinascatedra.blogspot.com.es/2015/12/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n93jdSQTO80

Since finding this out Inside Timeshare has identified the other photographs that Legalidades Abogados have downloaded from the internet and posted in their website with new fictitious names.

The next one is a Chilean lawyer Gabriel Palma Cruzat is a member of Palma Abogados.

gabriel-lindeno-miraldo-203x300

http://www.elmercurio.com/legal/noticias/opinion/2018/01/09/prevencion-de-delitos-en-las-empresas.aspx?disp=1

http://www.capital.cl/capital-legal/2018/01/04/146883/el-balance-de-la-ley-de-responsabilidad-de-personas-juridicas/

As you can see from the links above he is also a prominent lawyer.

Last but by no means least we have these three lawyers all from the Law firm Bufete Rodreguez-Monsalve, with offices at the following locations:

Madrid, Valladolid and Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, and abroad, with offices in Miami, Warsaw, Bogota, Lima, Kiev and Moscow.

bufete660-k57C-U212994882737HpF-575x323@Norte Castilla
The genuine lawyers

Below are links to their website and a newspaper article about their new office published in El Norte de Castilla:

http://www.rodriguez-monsalve.com/es/

http://www.elnortedecastilla.es/valladolid/201703/23/resuelve-dudas-juridicas-nuevo-20170323125458.html

This leaves us in no doubt that Legalidades Abogados are truly a “fake law firm” not only forging legal court documents, illegally using official logos, but also using the photographs of some prominent lawyers.

It now makes us wonder what other lawyers have had their photographs used in this way on the other websites involved with this fraudulent outfit, Inside Timeshare will obviously now be continuing with the research and trying to identify those on the other websites. We will keep you informed.

If you have been contacted by this firm or one of those we have previously highlighted, do not take any notice of anything they say, do not pay them any money, you will only lose it. For further information contact Inside Timeshare.

watching

Friday’s Letter from America

Welcome to this week’s Letter from America, in this article by Irene Parker with a contribution from Mike Finn of Finn Law Group, we look at the Timeshare Tax Trap.

The Orlando Sentinel has also published an article about Diamond and Orange Lake Resorts sueing Mike Finn, they accuse him of using  “false and misleading” claims in his ads. The article also mentions that Mike is cited by many publications as a successful cancellation attorney who along with other groups monitor timeshare companies, they go on to name the National Timeshare Owners Association and also Inside Timeshare. Mike is a regular contributor and offers valuable insights into the law for Inside Timeshare For the full article click on the link below.

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/business/brinkmann-on-business/os-bz-orange-lake-timeshare-finn-20180404-story.html

But first a new warning from Europe, one of our long standing regulars has been contacted by a new “law Firm”, yes you guessed it, another new name in the Litigious Abogados family from Tenerife.

legalidades-abogados-logo

The new name is Legalidades Abogados, using the same address we have seen before:

4, Calle de S. Francisco, Santa Cruz, 38002, Tenerife

Freephone: 0800 862 0995

Tenerife Tel: 0034 822 250 502

email: [email protected]

email: [email protected]

Once again the address is genuine and shows 2 lawyers plaques on the wall, neither are this one. The email addresses are also not linked to the website, but are ones you can register for free at consultant.com.

According to their website http://legalidades-abogados.com/ they were founded by  Alberto Kalimro Galvera, on Monday 19th July 1990. Again this date in 1990 was actually a Thursday, so once again not very much attention to detail there. They also still insist they have over 15 years presence on the internet, not bad since the website was only registered on 15 March 2018 with the registrant hidden by a privacy company.

After the initial call they send an email which is signed by Angelica Imolintos Lesterno from Departmento Legal. Also attached is a letter of 3 pages with many official looking logos, it is signed by another new name Pablo Ibernas Cavosa.

Here are the new lawyers names and photos, once again probably downloaded from the internet, without the knowledge of the actual persons.

alberto-kalimro-galvera  luciano-emanca-domeras  pedro-arenolde-verandel  gabriel-lindeno-miraldo-203x300  pablo-Ibernas-cavosa-legalidades-abogados-300x201

From left to right: Alberto Kalimro GalverLuciano Emanca DomerasPedro Arenolde VerandelPablo Ibernas Cavosa.

 

In this long winded letter, they go on to say that it is a “no win no fee” arrangement, but as we know from past experience the next stage will be a fee is required for the Procurador. After this there will be a fee to pay “tax” to release the money from the court.

Once again we remind you to be very wary on companies that make these wonderful claims, especially with a “no win no fee” arrangement. Do your homework, you know it makes sense.

Now for this week’s Letter from America.

The Timeshare Tax Trap – A 1099 Loan Forgiveness Tax Liability

$170,000 Diamond Timeshare Points Purchased for no Reason

Timeshare Attorney Mike Finn, a former C.P.A., weighs in

Tax Time

By Irene Parker

April 6, 2018

Two Inside Timeshare readers contacted us alarmed, because they received an IRS 1099 form, informing them of a timeshare tax liability. For one family, this meant possibly an additional $170,000 in income. This would have been bad enough, but the already Platinum Diamond Resort member said they purchased the points to participate in a program that did not exist.

Timeshare members have learned there is little to no timeshare enforcement of timeshare regulations in some states, so by relying on the oral representation clause, timeshare sales agents are allowed to say anything to sell vacation points. The Nevada Real Estate Division has routinely replied to timeshare buyers, “You have no proof,” according to member reports. Today’s family is one of eleven families complaining about the same sales Las Vegas sales agent.

A reminder no one should pay upfront money without checking with us or one of the advocacy self-help Facebooks and websites listed below. Lack of a secondary market for timeshare points gives rise to a flourishing community of scam artists.

This former Diamond member says DRI sales agent Rick Casper, working out of Polo Towers in Las Vegas, told him to buy more Diamond vacation points to eliminate maintenance fees. He and his wife wanted to talk to someone at DRI because they were struggling to pay maintenance fees on the 50,000 DRI points they already owned. This member is a 100% disabled Vietnam veteran, having been exposed to Agent Orange. The former member did not contact us to complain about Diamond Resorts. He wanted to know if there was anything that could be done about the 1099. I did ask why he purchased additional timeshare points from Rick Casper, given Inside Timeshare has received 11 identical complaints about the same Las Vegas sales agent over an 18 month period.    

In 2016 we went to Las Vegas and stayed at Diamond’s Cancun resort and met with Rick Casper. Mr. Casper said if we upgraded, we would be able to cover maintenance fees. However, maintenance fees increased after the upgrade to $16,000 a year. After five hours, my blood sugar was at 400. I was recovering from congestive heart failure. Rick Casper said it would cost us $198,000, $2500 a month in payments for the next 10 years but after ten years we would have no maintenance fees and no loan payment. Rick Casper said, “Then the little people will be paying for your vacation.” He said it would take a year to a year and a half to set up but he would personally handle it. He said since we were only paying $3, he had a guy that could sell points for much more than that and the proceeds would pay for the maintenance fees. I ended up paying a company in Branson MO $1500 to get out of this; but now the IRS has issued us a 1099 which has to be claimed as income. It’s for around $170,000. I’m now 71 years old. I would have been better off foreclosing.

Inside Timeshare has heard from 114 Diamond Resorts members since January 1. By publishing these accounts we hope to inform new timeshare buyers, and existing members upgrading, that the timeshare contract is perpetual, maintenance fees increase, and in most cases there is little or no secondary market.

Buyer Beware Active Duty military and law enforcements are especially affected by a bad timeshare purchase. We are assisting seven in fear of losing their Security Clearance. The ages and branch of military service of the 11 Rick Casper customers, who report being financially devastated as a result of their Polo Tower purchase, include:

  1. Age 69, Army, retired, 21 years
  2. Age 70, 100% disabled, Army, Agent Orange
  3. Age 68, Coast Guard veteran
  4. A stage 4 cancer patient, age 40s
  5. Age 60
  6. Age 69, Gulf War veteran, on 25 meds
  7. Age 61
  8. Age 66
  9. Age 56
  10. Mary Pfeifer, age 72, new complaint not unresolved
  11. Denise Hodgkins, age 56, new complaint, unresolved

I asked my CPA about the 1099. She said they would have referred the tax filer to a tax attorney, so the problem is not that simple. As usual, we went to timeshare attorney Mike Finn of the Finn Law Group. Mike provided an article about this important topic on his Learning Center.

https://www.finnlawgroup.com/learning-center/tax-time-contract-cancellation-timeshare-developer

An excerpt from Mike’s article:

Loan forgiveness

The 1099 form is referencing a large amount which may very well be taxable income! Unlike a mortgage balance forgiven, which would have been spread out over the life of the loan, this possibly taxable sum has been reported to the IRS in one lump sum! Say the amount reported is about $25,000. Say further that your tax bracket is 20%. Your new added tax bill is $5,000, and it’s due April 15th!

So, does this tax form receipt mean that the recipient is stuck with the tax bill for the so-called income? Well, possibly.

Consult with a tax professional before you assume that your receipt of a 1099 form from a timeshare developer automatically means you’re staring down significant tax liability. Understand we are not providing tax advice, merely a possible position that we believe is quite tenable and worth exploring with your own tax advisor. Although it’s accurate for me to state that I was a Certified Public Accountant, it is much more important to note that my C.P.A. licensure has long ago lapsed (because I didn’t choose to keep up with the annual professional education courses necessary to retain my certification). Please take your tax preparation advice solely from your own qualified tax return preparer.

Every tax filer is unique, with differing facts and circumstances. I am not offering, nor should you interpret my comments, as tax advice.

Historically, over the past half dozen years or so, hundreds and hundreds of Finn Law Group clients have received IRS 1099 forms, both 1099A’s and 1099C’s.  The receipt of these forms creates confusion.

I point you to IRS form #982. This is the form that the IRS advises should be filed along with the income tax return itself as a form of supporting schedule, which provides notification to the IRS that the amount presented to them via a 1099 is being acknowledged, but further, that the amount listed should be excluded from the taxpayer’s gross income. The myriad of possible reasons provided on the 982 Form are in and of themselves confusing and difficult to understand. I’m therefore providing my readers what I suggest may be appropriate reasoning in concluding that, in many cases, there should be no “income tax penalty” imposed after successfully negotiating a release of contract with your timeshare resort.

Allow me to provide my argument as to why some forms of debt forgiveness may well be construed as taxable income, and then differentiate the negotiated act of cancelling a timeshare contract and why this transaction therefore logically should be treated differently.

Since “income” generally means a measure of accretion of wealth or value added to your worth, then the cancellation of a debt, when that debt was incurred when you received something of value, should be counted as income because the elimination of the debt liability plus the retention of the item acquired when the debt was incurred increases your net worth. Under this definition of added wealth, the taxing of same would be quite logical.

Applying this argument to the cancellation of a timeshare contractual obligation and its related underlying indebtedness, it’s immediately evident that the cancelled owner has retained absolutely nothing of value. They’ve surrendered their interest in exchange for a debt and/or contract cancellation, but after the transaction they have absolutely no accretion of net worth.

Indeed, they’ve lost anything previously paid on an ‘asset’ they no longer own, so any argument that they’ve achieved and retained income or anything of value because of the contract cancellation is simply not accurate.

In terms of taxpayer reporting requirements, the issue becomes murkier when you apply it to timeshare transactions. Whether or not the industry will ever acknowledge that the resale value of a timeshare interest is minimal at best, what we can establish is that it would be extremely unusual for anyone other than the resort developer to acquire the timeshare interest at foreclosure, and therefore the liquidated basis of the interest will nearly always be zero, or at best a nominal value at foreclosure. Also making the timeshare transaction more complex in terms of following the instructions of either IRS form 982 and/or publication 4681 relating to this issue is determining whether the underlying debt should be viewed as “recourse” or “non-recourse,” given the propensity of the developers to utilize non-recourse based non-judicial foreclosures to recover the interest the greatest majority of the time.

I’ve attempted to avoid becoming overly technical in terms of specifically advising of taxpayer reporting other than to suggest very generally that the filing of the IRS form 982 will most probably be required. Lastly, I do strongly recommend utilizing a professional tax return preparer, as these forms are not at all intuitive.

I earnestly wish that I could offer something less complex to help provide absolute answers to this prominent issue, but I do feel that this is important because the financial ramifications are potentially high.

Respectfully provided,

Michael D. Finn, Esq.

Michael-D-Finn2

Thank you, Mike, for the timeshare accounting lesson. One question I had is,

What is the difference between a 1099 A and a 1099 C?

http://www.koontzassociates.com/pages/know-the-difference-between-a-1099-a-and-1099-c/

Contact Inside Timeshare or one of these self-help groups if you have a timeshare nightmare. We know there are many that use and enjoy their timeshare, some having not faced a need to sell it, or were lucky to purchase from a sales agent that sold the product as the product is intended.

https://www.facebook.com/timeshareadvocategroup/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/DiamondResortsOwnersAdvocacy/

https://tug2.com/Home.aspx

https://www.facebook.com/groups/180578055325962/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/465692163568779/

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1639958046252175/

Deceptive

Elder Abuse:

https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/elder-fraud-charges-announced

All of the schemes have one goal: to trick and deceive senior citizens into turning over their hard-earned savings. Last year, the FBI opened more than 200 financial crime cases that involved elderly victims, Bowdich said. The investigations covered a range of crimes, from investment frauds to reverse mortgage scams.

Thank you Irene for this weeks article and also a very big thank you to Mike Finn for his contribution.

Inside Timeshare welcomes your comments on this or any article published, also if you need any information about your ownership or any company that has contacted you or you are thinking of doing business with, contact Inside Timeshare and we will point you in the right direction.

Friday is upon us the weekend beckons, we hope you have a great and relaxing one. See you next week.

weekend 1

TESS Allegations: Here are the Facts

As we mentioned yesterday, TESS and David Cox are at it again, bringing false allegations against Inside Timeshare and Canarian Legal Alliance. Using allegations made by a very dubious and discredited source called Alberto Garcia. He even uses links to the Daily Mail to corroborate his allegations, the information given to the Daily Mail was supplied by Garcia himself.

Alberto Garcia was at one time employed as head of the enforcement program for the RDO (Resorts Development Organisation), he ran a blog site purporting to be a consumer association called Mindtimeshare. This was funded by the RDO and Alberto Garcia had the task of destroying any company that was not a member of the RDO, or who threatened the industry financially.

It is well documented that Garcia himself had a personal vendetta against Eugen Kaiser and any company he had dealings with. This did culminate in a raid by the Policia Nacional on Club Puerto Atlantico and other offices in 2013. This raid was in organised and instigated by Garcia, using his old contacts at the Policia Nacional, where he was once an inspector.

Eighteen lawyers were accused of being part of a criminal gang, within days of the arrests it was up before a judge at the court in Las Palmas. This judge ruled that the warrants for the raid, which incidentally did not appear until hours after the raid took place, were illegal and so the raid, arrests and seizure of property was also illegal.

It is also fact that this judge had also sat on cases brought by the lawyers of CLA against the timeshare industry. He ordered a full investigation into the facts of the raid and Garcia disappeared. Eventually, several senior police officers faced charges for collaborating with Garcia on an illegal operation.

No charges were ever brought against Eugen Kaiser, Paula Beatson the lawyers or any of the staff that were detained. In fact they all made official denuncias against Garcia, Mindtimeshare and the authorities. Alberto Garcia was forced to step down as director of Mindtimeshare and the enforcement program in early 2017, the RDO did not renew funding for Mindtimeshare in April 2017.

As for David Cox’s allegations that all the cases are false, below are links to the Jurisprudencia website, where you will see the official sentences for 5 of the 99 Supreme Court rulings brought by lawyers of Canarian Legal Alliance on behalf of their clients: (Note: to use these links you will need to register free on the website, right click open in new window, go to Usario in top right and register, this can be done either through Google + Facebook or linkedin, you can also register with a user name and add password).

Silverpoint Supreme Court link

https://www.iberley.es/jurisprudencia/sentencia-civil-n-431-2017-ts-sala-civil-sec-1-rec-2634-2015-10-07-2017-47716369?term=431%2F2017&year=&tipo_sentencia=&query=431%2F2017+AND+%28club+la+costa%29&filtrar%5B0%5D=club+la+costa&noIndex

https://www.iberley.es/jurisprudencia/sentencia-civil-n-133-2018-ts-sala-civil-sec-1-rec-2670-2016-07-03-2018-47813194?term=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+133%2F2018&query=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+133%2F2018&noIndex

https://www.iberley.es/jurisprudencia/sentencia-civil-n-121-2018-ts-sala-civil-sec-1-rec-1192-2016-07-03-2018-47813261?term=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+121%2F2018&query=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+121%2F2018&noIndex

Puerto Calma Supreme Court link

https://www.iberley.es/jurisprudencia/sentencia-civil-n-131-2018-ts-sala-civil-sec-1-rec-382-2016-07-03-2018-47813179?term=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+131%2F2018&query=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+131%2F2018&noIndex

Anfi

https://www.iberley.es/jurisprudencia/sentencia-civil-n-633-2016-ts-sala-civil-sec-1-rec-2627-2014-25-10-2016-47624792?term=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+633%2F2016&query=tribunal+supremo+sala+la+civil+633%2F2016&noIndex

Below are three PDF’s of sentence reports sent to the lawyers and clients from the Supreme Court.

98.2 data protected Silverpoint (sea)

99.2 data protected Silverpoint (pau)

100.2 data protected Puerto Calma (rus)

You will see the names of three lawyers on these documents:

MIGUEL ÁNGEL MELIÁN SANTANA [Nº3552 ICALPA ]

ÓSCAR SALVADOR SANTANA GONZÁLEZ [Nº 3563 ICALPA]

MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ CEBALLOS [Nº 2814 ICALPA]

All three can be found on the CLA website under lawyers.

https://www.canarianlegalalliance.com/lawyers/

By using the link below you can check on the official register of lawyers by using their ICALPA number and selecting Las Palmas as the Collegio, the press BUSCAR. This will bring up the lawyers name, by clicking on the name, you will then find address, telephone number, date of admittance to the college or Alata Colegiación and the date of renewal.

http://www.abogacia.es/servicios-abogacia/censo-de-letrados/

This should leave you in no doubt that David Cox’s allegations are false.

As for myself and my website Inside Timeshare, I did state yesterday that I do have a very good working relationship with Canarian Legal Alliance, in fact one of the lawyers is dealing with a legal dispute with a bank for my partner.

I do undertake work for them on behalf of their clients, this usually involves finding the information on companies they have paid to carry out services such as relinquishments, resales, fraudulent claims companies and bogus holiday clubs. This then helps them to instigate section 75 claims for their clients, on many occasions this has been done by Inside Timeshare free of any charge, not even a success fee! Can TESS say the same?

As for David Cox, well below is a PDF of all the companies he has been involved with, this has been taken from Company House Records:

David Andrew COX – Personal Appointments

It should also be remembered that when he was running the TCA, that website even recommended CLA as one of the best law firms to engage. This all went by the board the moment he asked CLA to pay him for the recommendation. It was obvious that he needed money, as the TCA website at the time was even asking people to make donations!

It is also understood he even went to Gran Canaria to meet with CLA and was put up in the Club Puerto Atlantico Hotel, as guest with no charge to himself. This meeting was to try and do a deal for TESS to pass on clients to CLA regarding claims for Spanish Timeshares. From reports by those that saw him, he seemed to spend most of the time inebriated!

DavidCox

Although I do personally undertake work for CLA, Inside Timeshare is an independent voice for timeshare owners, CLA has no influence on the articles published, they are either from my research or are personal opinions. All the articles published from Canada, The Philippines, Australia and most importantly from America are submitted by readers in those countries, bringing the timeshare community worldwide together.

So Mr Cox, your time is coming, my lawyer is preparing a case against you and no doubt so is CLA.

Our regular readers are those we have helped, again free of any charge, they know the truth. Inside Timeshare is still being asked for help from desperate owners not knowing who to trust, With your allegations you have shown that you and your company TESS are in the category of not to be trusted.

Hope to see you in court soon.